MHB Finding the angle opposite the R

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
To find the angle opposite the resultant (R) without using the parallelogram rule, one method involves using the relationship between angles in a triangle. Given that the angle between forces F1 and F2 is 25 degrees, the angle opposite R can be calculated by subtracting this angle from 180 degrees. This results in an angle of 155 degrees. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding angle relationships in different geometric configurations. Alternative methods for calculating angles in vector addition are encouraged.
Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
can you show me another way of finding the angle opposite the resultant

the way I find it is by constructing a parallelogram and knowing that the angles in a parallelogram add up to 360 deg and knowing that the angle between F1 and F2 is 25 deg then I subtracted twice of that to 360 deg getting 310 deg and dividing by 2 I get the angle opposite R as 155 deg.

can you show me another method on how to determine that without using parallelogram rule. thanks!
 

Attachments

  • MEch.png
    MEch.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 115
Mathematics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • drainbrain.png
    drainbrain.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 90
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top