MHB Finding the angle opposite the R

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
AI Thread Summary
To find the angle opposite the resultant (R) without using the parallelogram rule, one method involves using the relationship between angles in a triangle. Given that the angle between forces F1 and F2 is 25 degrees, the angle opposite R can be calculated by subtracting this angle from 180 degrees. This results in an angle of 155 degrees. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding angle relationships in different geometric configurations. Alternative methods for calculating angles in vector addition are encouraged.
Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
can you show me another way of finding the angle opposite the resultant

the way I find it is by constructing a parallelogram and knowing that the angles in a parallelogram add up to 360 deg and knowing that the angle between F1 and F2 is 25 deg then I subtracted twice of that to 360 deg getting 310 deg and dividing by 2 I get the angle opposite R as 155 deg.

can you show me another method on how to determine that without using parallelogram rule. thanks!
 

Attachments

  • MEch.png
    MEch.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 111
Mathematics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • drainbrain.png
    drainbrain.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 90
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top