Finding the change in weight from the force & difference in height (y)

Ella1777
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Information Given:In 1956, Frank Lloyd Wright proposed the construction of a mile-high building in Chicago. Suppose the building had been constructed.

Question: Ignoring Earth's rotation, find the change in your weight if you were to ride an elevator from the street level, where you weigh 708 N, to the top of the building.

Attempt:
earth's radius is: 4000m
w=708N*(4000/4001)^2=707.6461327N
(since there is a difference by a mile high)
Then I take this and subtract it from the original weigh
708-707.6461327=0.3538673
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ella1777 said:
Then I take this and subtract it from the original weigh
708-707.6461327=0.3538673

Your approach is fine, but you need to write out the units and not use too many significant digits. Also, note the following:

Ella1777 said:
earth's radius is: 4000m
The unit m is typically reserved for the SI unit meter and the Earth radius is certainly not 4000 m. The non-SI unit mile is typically abbreviated mi.
 
Orodruin said:
Your approach is fine, but you need to write out the units and not use too many significant digits. Also, note the following:The unit m is typically reserved for the SI unit meter and the Earth radius is certainly not 4000 m. The non-SI unit mile is typically abbreviated mi.

I forgot to put my units on this post but I already have the correct units on my homework the units are not my concern since I understand them get it right the majority of the time.
As far as significant digits goes I have to write it all out our professor has stated that it’s the root of the cause of many wrong answers. I put my final answer in my homework as 0.354 (since it is 3 sig figs and sig figs applies to the final answer) Does that mean earth’s radius is 4000mi and I must convert that meters??

Thank you!
 
Ella1777 said:
Does that mean earth’s radius is 4000mi and I must convert that meters??
The figure for the Earth's radius is indeed 4000 mi. But there is no need to convert to meters. You also have the building height in miles. Working in miles and obtaining a dimensionless distance ratio of 4001/4000 is perfectly appropriate.

Can you justify the use of three significant digits in the answer?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
jbriggs444 said:
The figure for the Earth's radius is indeed 4000 mi. But there is no need to convert to meters. You also have the building height in miles. Working in miles and obtaining a dimensionless distance ratio of 4001/4000 is perfectly appropriate.

Can you justify the use of three significant digits in the answer?
The answer typed into Wileyplus must be 3 significant figures which rounds to 0.354 but only the final answer applies significant figures all the other work has to include all the digits
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
10K