Finding the Distance Between Sound and Wave Maxima at a Train Station

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance between the zero and first order maxima of sound waves produced by two trains approaching a station at 120 km/h, each whistling at 5000 Hz. The Doppler effect formula, f = fo [c/(c-v)], is applied with c set to 331 m/s and v converted to m/s for accurate calculations. The correct distance between the maxima at t=0 is determined to be 893/60000 m, with participants clarifying that the first order maxima is offset by a distance d, which is ultimately found to be λ/4 after correcting initial misunderstandings regarding wave interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Doppler effect principles and equations
  • Understanding of sound wave interference
  • Basic kinematics related to motion and velocity
  • Knowledge of wavelength calculations (λ = c/f)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Doppler effect in different scenarios, including moving sources and observers.
  • Explore wave interference patterns and their mathematical representations.
  • Learn about sound wave properties and how they relate to frequency and wavelength.
  • Investigate the impact of relative motion on sound perception in real-world applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics and the Doppler effect, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of sound wave interference.

timetraveller123
Messages
620
Reaction score
45

Homework Statement


Two trains approach the train station from opposite sides each moving at an initialvelocity of 120 km/h with respect to the station and slowing down to a halt in 20seconds. If both trains are whistling at 5000 Hz, find the distance between the zeroand first order maxima as a function of time.
4-e89aee99f1.jpg


so this is the question:
when they say zero and first order maxima they mean it only lies on the x-axis right meaning the zero order maxima is at the centre of the two trains and the first order maxima is at distance d away where the extra length traveled is exactly a wavelength so i did the question just for the part when the trains are not decelerating ie t=0 and my solution does not match the given one please help or is the first order maxima in the y direction

Homework Equations


f = fo [c/c-v] --- doppler effect for train approaching
c= 331m/s
λ = c/f
v = 120/3.6 m/s
the given solution is at t =0 the distance between the zero and first order is 893/60000 m

The Attempt at a Solution


the first order is offset to one side by distance d so
2d is the extra length traveled the sound wave coming from the other side hence
2d=λ
2d = c/f
2d = c(c-v)/(2c fo)
plugging in gets me 893/30000 which is twice of correct answer please help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vishnu 73 said:
2d is the extra length traveled the sound wave coming from the other side
True, but doesn't the one from the opposite side travel over a little less distance ?
 
BvU said:
True, but doesn't the one from the opposite side travel over a little less distance ?
i am sorry i don't get what you mean could please explain your point thanks
 
Make a drawing and you'll see it more easily. Constructive interference occurs where one wave travels ##{1\over 2}\lambda ## further and the other ##{1\over 2}\lambda ## less.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
BvU said:
Make a drawing and you'll see it more easily. Constructive interference occurs where one wave travels ##{1\over 2}\lambda ## further and the other ##{1\over 2}\lambda ## less.
oh i see it now thanks so much !
 
You're welcome :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timetraveller123
no wait sir i did what you said and all of a sudden i am confused again as i once again get d =λ/2 please enlighten me as if one wave were to travel 1/2λ lesser it implies that that is d
 
BvU said:
Make a drawing and you'll see it more easily. Constructive interference occurs where one wave travels ##{1\over 2}\lambda## further and the other ##{1\over 2}\lambda## less.
I made the drawing and find I have to correct myself: not ##{1\over 2}\lambda## but ##{1\over 4}\lambda## ... o:)

Can you see why ?

(It's astounding to see how much more instructive an animated picture is wrt one on paper ! How wonderful all these newfangled technologies o0) )
 
thank you sir i figured out my mistake i was all along using cos graph for both side only to realize that when the two cos graphs collide they will super pose to zero at every point i should have used cos graph on one side and -cos graph on the other side and then your 1/4λ thing works thanks for your troubles really appreciate it !
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K