Finding the final velocity using momentum and KE

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 4K views
lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2
Before the collision, there are two masses. Mass 1 is at rest and mass 2 is moving. No friction. It is an elastic collision and mass 2 is moving in positive x direction.

After the collision, is it correct that mass 1 moves in positive x direction but mass 2 rebounds and moves in negative x direction? If so, is this the equation for momentum:

m[itex]_{2}[/itex]v[itex]_{2i}[/itex]=m[itex]_{1}[/itex]v[itex]_{1f}[/itex]-m[itex]_{2}[/itex]v[itex]_{2f}[/itex]

And the equation for KE:

[itex]_{2}[/itex](v[itex]_{2i}[/itex])^2=m[itex]_{1}[/itex](v[itex]_{1f}[/itex])^2+m[itex]_{2}[/itex](v[itex]_{2f}[/itex])^2

And if solving for v[itex]_{1f}[/itex] :

v[itex]_{1f}[/itex]=[itex]\sqrt{\frac{m_{2}(v_{2i})^2}{m_{1}}}[/itex]

And the velocity of this mass should be in the positive x direction.

Does everything look correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lonewolf219 said:
is this the equation for momentum:

m[itex]_{2}[/itex]v[itex]_{2i}[/itex]=m[itex]_{1}[/itex]v[itex]_{1f}[/itex]-m[itex]_{2}[/itex]v[itex]_{2f}[/itex]
Does the RHS represent total momentum after collision? Doesn't look like it.
 
Thanks Haruspex... Does mass 2 then not change direction and not travel along negative x? Mass 2 is twice the mass as mass 1.
 
Last edited:
lonewolf219 said:
Thanks Haruspex... Does mass 2 then not change direction and not travel along negative x? Mass 2 is twice the mass as mass 1.
What do the equations tell you? You shouldn't need to be taking any square roots, thereby introducing ambiguity in sign. If you handle the conservation equations correctly you can obtain a simple ratio between relative velocities. Combined with the mass ratio you can then determine all velocities in terms of the initial velocity of mass 2.
 
Thanks for pointing out the proper method. So since mass 1 has half the mass of mass 2, mass 2 does not rebound and change directions? What if the masses were switched? If mass 1 were moving and collided with the more massive mass 2 at rest, would mass 1 change direction in this case?
 
lonewolf219 said:
Thanks for pointing out the proper method. So since mass 1 has half the mass of mass 2, mass 2 does not rebound and change directions? What if the masses were switched? If mass 1 were moving and collided with the more massive mass 2 at rest, would mass 1 change direction in this case?
Is that what the equations tell you? Please post your working.
 
lonewolf219 said:
Thanks Haruspex... Does mass 2 then not change direction and not travel along negative x? Mass 2 is twice the mass as mass 1.
It is not a matter of "changing direction" or "not changing direction". Total momentum is always [itex]m_1v_1+ m_2v_2[/itex]. Whether or not a mass changes direction is signaled by the sign of its v. If mass 2 is twice mass 1 and has initial velocity [itex]v_i[/itex] then "conservation of momentum" is [itex]2mv_i= mv_1+ 2mv_2[/itex] where [itex]v_1[/itex] is the velocity after the collision of mass 1 and [itex]v_2[/itex] is the velocity after the collision of mass 2.
"Conservation of kinetic energy" is [itex](1/2)2mv_i^2= (1/2)mv_1^2+ (1/2)(2m)v_2^2[/itex]. Of course,, you can divide both equations by "m" eliminating that. You will have [itex]v_1+ 2v_2= 2v_i[/itex] and [itex]v_1^2+ 2v_2^2= 2v_i^2[/itex]. You could then, for example, solve the first equation for [itex]v_1= 2v_i- 2v_2[/itex] and replace [itex]v_1[/itex] in the second equation by that to get a quadratic equation for [itex]v_2[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks Haruspex and HallsofIvy, I appreciate your help!

Haruspex has asked me more than once "Is that what the equation tells you?" Now I realize what you are saying (thanks HallsofIvy for your explanation)... you are saying that we do not know if the mass will rebound or not until we solve the equation. So, we can't choose a direction for the final velocity before we have solved for it. But if the final velocities are in opposite directions, then we would conclude that the moving mass rebounded. Is this right, Haruspex?
 
lonewolf219 said:
Thanks Haruspex and HallsofIvy, I appreciate your help!

Haruspex has asked me more than once "Is that what the equation tells you?" Now I realize what you are saying (thanks HallsofIvy for your explanation)... you are saying that we do not know if the mass will rebound or not until we solve the equation. So, we can't choose a direction for the final velocity before we have solved for it. But if the final velocities are in opposite directions, then we would conclude that the moving mass rebounded. Is this right, Haruspex?
Yes. It often happens when trying to find a vector (force, velocity, whatever) that you don't know in advance which direction it will be in. So you just choose a direction as positive, and if the equations give you a negative answer then you know it was the other way.
 
Awesome! Thanks for your help, Haruspex... This concept is very important!