Finding the Ground State of a Hamiltonian Operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the ground state of a Hamiltonian operator represented by a 3x3 matrix, specifically H = ℏω \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & i & 0 \\ -i & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right) \]. The eigenvalues obtained are {0, 1, 2}, with the ground state corresponding to the lowest eigenvalue, which is 0. However, the discussion highlights the importance of the potential in determining whether a ground state can have zero energy. The commutator [H, A] is calculated, leading to a trivial inequality when evaluated in the ground state, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian operators and quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of uncertainty relations in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of zero energy in quantum mechanics
  • Learn how to calculate eigenvectors corresponding to eigenvalues
  • Explore the significance of potential energy in determining ground states
  • Investigate the uncertainty principle and its applications in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers working on Hamiltonian systems and quantum mechanics.

Matthollyw00d
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
When given a Hamiltonian operator (in this case a 3x3 matrix), how do you go about find the ground state, when this operator is all that is given? By the SE when have H\Psi=E\Psi. I can easily solve for Eigenvalues/vectors, but which correspond to the ground state, or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ground state is the state with the lowest energy.
 
So I achieve eigenvalues of \{0,1,2\} (this is actually the eigenvalues I have for the problem), would the 0 or the 1 be the lowest state? I assumed 0, but can a ground state have 0 energy?
 
It depends on the potential. You can always add a constant to the potential without changing anything physically, which would shift the total energy by the same amount. What you can't really have is the kinetic energy being 0 because there should always be some motion even in the ground state.
 
Let H=\hbar\omega \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; i &amp; 0 \\<br /> -i &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right) \]
and let A =\hbar \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; i \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> -i &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right].

Calculate the uncertainty relation \sigma_E \sigma_a for a system in the energy ground state.

My problem is calculating \langle [H,A]\rangle.
The commutator [H,A]=\hbar^2\omega \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right]
And if relevant the eigenvalues of H are \hbar\omega \{0,1,2\}.
It says to calculate in the ground state, but I don't know the ground state, so how do I gather it from this data?
 
You have the eigenvalue for the ground state, now find the corresponding eigenvector. It will be a (non-zero) vector

v_0 = \begin{pmatrix} a \\ b \\ c \end{pmatrix}

satisfying

H v_0 = 0.
 
Yes, but \langle v_0|[H,A]|v_0 \rangle =0 which gives me a trivial inequality, which leads me to believe something is incorrect and hence why I posted here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K