Finding the Intersection of Sets X and Y with Algebraic Methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter yorick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
yorick
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


X = {x: x=4n+1, n[tex]\in[/tex][tex]N[/tex]}
Y = {y: y=m[tex]^{2}[/tex]+m+1, m[tex]\in[/tex][tex]N[/tex]}

Find: Y[tex]\cap[/tex]X

The Attempt at a Solution



First I tried to set x=y
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] n[tex]^{2}[/tex]+n+1=4n+1
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] n[tex]^{2}[/tex]-3n=0
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] n(n-3)=0
[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] n=0,3

Subbing this into either equation yields {1,13}.
I thought I was doing okay.
However I was comparing assignments with a classmate and she had this massive set that just keeps on going: {1, 13, 21, 57, 73, 133, 157, 241, 273, ...}
After I thought about it, this made sense, as my solution only found the elements that are in both sets when n is the same for both equations, but set equality relies only on its elements, not at what stage they were reached.
She'd done this the long way round, scripting a little program to calculate all elements for both sets then compare the elements and find the common ones.
What I'd like to know is, how can I go about solving this algebraically?

Thanks in advance,
Yorick.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
write the equation as it is.

m^2 + m + 1 = 4n + 1
--> m^2 + m = 4n
--> m(m+1) = 4n

now rhs is a multiple of 4... and therefore, so must the lhs. But if m is even, m + 1 is odd...
do you see where i am going with this? can you proceed?
 
Yes, Thankyou!

So basically the solution is something like {x: x=m^2 + m + 1 ; m/4[tex]\in[/tex][tex]N[/tex] or (m+1)/4[tex]\in[/tex][tex]N[/tex]}
 
yorick said:
Yes, Thankyou!

So basically the solution is something like {x: x=m^2 + m + 1 ; m/4[tex]\in[/tex][tex]N[/tex] or (m+1)/4[tex]\in[/tex][tex]N[/tex]}

yep... that's right!