Finding the Lagrangian of a bead sliding along a wire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for a bead sliding along a parabolic wire defined by the equation az = x². The kinetic energy K is expressed in terms of mass m, the constant a, and the horizontal position x and its velocity x-dot. The correct formulation of the kinetic energy is K = (1/2)m[(x-dot)² + (2x(x-dot)/a)²], which incorporates the constraint of motion along the wire by eliminating z and z-dot. Participants clarify the relationships between the variables and confirm the validity of the equations used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of constraints in motion
  • Basic calculus for differentiation and rearranging equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Lagrangian mechanics in detail
  • Learn how to apply constraints in dynamic systems
  • Explore examples of kinetic energy derivations in constrained motion
  • Investigate the application of calculus in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, and educators looking to enhance their understanding of Lagrangian dynamics and constrained motion systems.

Rumor
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A bead with mass m slides without friction on a wire which lies in a vertical plane near the earth. The wire lies in the x-z plane and is bent into a shape conforming to the parabola az = x2, where a is a positive known constant. (X is horizontal and z is vertical) The particle moves in the x-z plane but its motion is constrained by the requirement that it remains on the wire.

Find the kinetic energy in terms of m, a, x, x-dot. (Eliminate z and z-dot using the constraint)"

Homework Equations


z = x2/a and z-dot = (x-dot)2/a
(I think these are the restraint equations, unless I did these wrong.)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that K = (1/2)mv2, so in this case wouldn't that translate to K = (1/2)*m*((x-dot)2 + (z-dot)2)?

If so, then continuing on, K = (1/2)*m*(x-dot)2+((x-dot)2/a)2) or K = (1/2)*m*(x-dot)2+[(x-dot)4/a2]

Am I doing this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rumor said:
1.

Homework Equations


z = x2/a and z-dot = (x-dot)2/a
(I think these are the restraint equations, unless I did these wrong.)


z-dot = what now?
 
It's not specified within the problem given. I just rearranged the given equation ( az = x^2 ) and applied it to z-dot as well, since part of the problem later requires eliminating z and z-dot.
 
Well, I would have written z-dot = 2x(x-dot)/a.

Would you like to see how I got that? Might be a chance for you to make a fool out of me. It happens often enough! :-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K