MHB Finding the LCM of two expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter zolton5971
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expressions
zolton5971
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Find the least common denominator of 3(2x-2) and x(5x-)5

I wanted to double check this, I got 10 as an answer? If not how would you get the LCD?

.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zolton5971 said:
Find the least common denominator of 3(2x-2) and x(5x-)5

I wanted to double check this, I got 10 as an answer? If not how would you get the LCD?

.

Do you mean $$x(5x-5)$$? You're answer should include $$x$$ somewhere

The lowest common multiple (LCM) is given by splitting each term into prime factors and multiplying by the highest power of each prime factor. For example to find the LCM of 10 and 15 (it's 30) you'd do

$$10 = 2 \times 5 \text{ and }\ 15 = 3 \times 5[/math] so the LCM is given by $$2 \times 3 \times 5 = 30$$

You can do the same with algebraic fractions but remember to treat any polynomials or variables as prime - after simplifying you have $$6(x-1)$$ and $$5x(x-1)$$

Can you use the method above to find the LCM?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
965
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top