MHB Finding the Min Sum of a Sequence of Numbers in $Z$

Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$x_0,x_1,-----,x_{2004} \in Z , \, x_0=0, \mid x_n \mid =\mid x_{n-1}+1\mid $

$for, \,\, 1 \leq n \leq 2004$

(1) $find :\,\, min\mid x_1+x_2+x_3+ ------+x_{2004}\mid $

(2) get a set of numbers $ x_1,x_2,-----x_{2004} $ satisfying your answer
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
$x_0,x_1,-----,x_{2004} \in Z , \, x_0=0, \mid x_n \mid =\mid x_{n-1}+1\mid $

$for, \,\, 1 \leq n \leq 2004$

(1) $find :\,\, \min\mid x_1+x_2+x_3+ ------+x_{2004}\mid $

(2) get a set of numbers $ x_1,x_2,-----x_{2004} $ satisfying your answer
[sp]Starting from $0$, you can get sequences of terms ending with another zero, for example
$-1,\ 0$ (two terms, with sum $-1$),

$1,\ 2,\ -3,\ 2,\ -3,\ -2,\ -1,\ 0$ (eight terms, with sum $-4$).​

In fact, for any $n$, starting from $0$ you can find sequences of $2n$ terms that bring you back to $0$, but the sum of the terms in the sequence will always be $-n$. So to minimise $$\Bigl|\sum_{n=1}^{2004}x_n\Bigr|$$ you need to build up a negative sum from such sequences, and then end with a run of positive terms to cancel out as much as possible of the negative sum. For example, suppose that $$x_n = \begin{cases}-1&(n \text{ odd, }1\leqslant n\leqslant 1959), \\ 0&(n \text{ even, }2\leqslant n\leqslant 1960), \\ n-1960&(1961\leqslant n\leqslant 2004).\end{cases}$$ Then the sum of the first 1960 terms is $-980$, the sum of the remaining terms is $1+2+3+\ldots+44 = 990$ and therefore $$\Bigl|\sum_{n=1}^{2004}x_n\Bigr| = 10.$$ As far as I can see, that is the smallest possible value for $$\Bigl|\sum_{n=1}^{2004}x_n\Bigr|.$$[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Starting from $0$, you can get sequences of terms ending with another zero, for example
$-1,\ 0$ (two terms, with sum $-1$),

$1,\ 2,\ -3,\ 2,\ -3,\ -2,\ -1,\ 0$ (eight terms, with sum $-4$).​

In fact, for any $n$, starting from $0$ you can find sequences of $2n$ terms that bring you back to $0$, but the sum of the terms in the sequence will always be $-n$. So to minimise $$\Bigl|\sum_{n=1}^{2004}x_n\Bigr|$$ you need to build up a negative sum from such sequences, and then end with a run of positive terms to cancel out as much as possible of the negative sum. For example, suppose that $$x_n = \begin{cases}-1&(n \text{ odd, }1\leqslant n\leqslant 1959), \\ 0&(n \text{ even, }2\leqslant n\leqslant 1960), \\ n-1960&(1961\leqslant n\leqslant 2004).\end{cases}$$ Then the sum of the first 1960 terms is $-980$, the sum of the remaining terms is $1+2+3+\ldots+44 = 990$ and therefore $$\Bigl|\sum_{n=1}^{2004}x_n\Bigr| = 10.$$ As far as I can see, that is the smallest possible value for $$\Bigl|\sum_{n=1}^{2004}x_n\Bigr|.$$[/sp]
thanks ,your answer is correct :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top