Finding the Minimum Non-Zero Element of a Set

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter azal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Minimum Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on defining the minimum non-zero element of a set using a mathematical expression. The original formulation involves a complex equation with multiple constraints, specifically using the notation ζ(j) and modular arithmetic. A participant suggests a more concise representation that simplifies the expression while retaining its meaning. The revised notation is ζ(j) := min b^{t,j}_{i} mod θ_{k}, where k and t are defined within specific ranges, streamlining the overall presentation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and functions
  • Knowledge of set theory and indexing
  • Basic concepts of optimization in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research modular arithmetic applications in optimization problems
  • Explore concise mathematical notation techniques
  • Study set theory and its implications in mathematical expressions
  • Learn about optimization methods in mathematical programming
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in optimization, students studying set theory, and anyone interested in simplifying complex mathematical expressions.

azal
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

As part of my paper I need to define the minimum non-zero element of some set.
In particular I have,
[itex] \begin{equation}<br /> \zeta(j):= \displaystyle \min_{\substack{ k\in1..\kappa\\<br /> t\in 1..\kappa+1,~i \in \mathcal I^{t,j},\\<br /> b_i^{t,j} \mod \theta_k \neq 0}} b_i^{t,j} \mod \theta_k.<br /> \end{equation}[/itex]
But this is not very nice.
Is there maybe a nicer and more concise way to do this?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you don't absolutely have to put everything in the 'minimum of' sign you could just state

ζ(j):=min b[itex]^{t,j}_{i}[/itex] modθ[itex]_{k}[/itex]

where k[itex]\in[/itex]{1,...,κ}, t[itex]\in[/itex]{1,...,κ+1},
i[itex]\in[/itex]I[itex]^{t,j}[/itex] and b[itex]^{t,j}_{i}[/itex] modθ[itex]_{k}[/itex][itex]\neq[/itex]0.
 
oh that's a good idea ... haha, don't know why i didn't think of that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K