MHB Finding the Minimum Value of a Parabola: Tips and Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasu1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Set
AI Thread Summary
To find the minimum value of the quadratic function f(x)=3x^2+10x+219, the vertex formula x=-b/(2a) can be used, where a=3 and b=10. Calculating this gives x=-10/(2*3)=-5/3. Substituting x back into the function provides the minimum value of f(x). Additionally, participants are reminded to adhere to forum rules, particularly regarding clarity in expressing difficulties. Understanding the vertex's role is crucial for solving problems involving parabolas.
hasu1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What is the smallest value in the image set of the function:

f(x)=3x^2+10x+219
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forum!

The vertex (minimum or maximum) of a parabola $f(x)=ax^2+bx+c$ has $x$-coordinate $x=-\dfrac{b}{2a}$.

For the future, please read the forum http://mathhelpboards.com/rules/, especially rule #11. In this case, you could write what facts about parabolas you know and what exactly your difficulty is in applying them.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top