Finding the State of a Quantum System with Given Hamiltonian and Observable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the state of a quantum system given a Hamiltonian and an observable. The original poster presents a Hamiltonian matrix and an observable matrix, along with an initial measurement result. They seek to determine the state of the system at a later time, referencing a solution provided by their professor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the Hamiltonian, observable, and the time evolution of the state. There are attempts to clarify the use of the exponential operator in the context of quantum mechanics and the completeness relation for eigenkets.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the application of the completeness relation and the role of eigenvectors in the solution. Some participants question the contributions of different eigenvectors to the final state, while others emphasize the importance of normalization in the completeness relation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's uncertainty regarding the calculations involved in reaching the provided solution, as well as a note that this is their first post, inviting feedback from others.

LizardWizard
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
We are given the Hamiltonian H and an observable A
##H=\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 0 & 0\\0 & 0 & 1\\0 & 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}\hbar\omega
A=
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0\\0 & 1 & 0\\0 & 0 & -1
\end{pmatrix}a
##
We are also told that at ##t=0## we have that a measurement of A gives us -a, and then we are asked to determine the generic state of the system at time t

The attempt at a solution

For starters, the solution the professor gives is $$|\psi(t)\rangle=
\begin{pmatrix}
0\\-isin(\omega t)\\cos(\omega t)
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Now while I don't know how to arrive to this solution in particular, I know this result most likely follows from $$\psi(t)=e^{-iEt/\hbar}$$
since we already have that ##E=\hbar\omega##
But how exactly do I arrive at the solution provided? This is somewhat different from all the exercises I've seen so far so I don't really know the calculations involved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought I'd add some extra information. In another exercise we have
##H=\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0\\1 & 0 & 0\\0 & 0 & 1
\end{pmatrix}\hbar\omega
A=
\begin{pmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0\\0 & 1 & 0\\0 & 0 & -1
\end{pmatrix}a
##
and solution
$$|\psi(t)\rangle=
\begin{pmatrix}
-isin(\omega t)\\cos(\omega t)\\0
\end{pmatrix}
$$
Perhaps this helps illustrate my problem with this. The solution itself makes sense to me but the mechanism behind it elude me.

By the way this is my first post so please don't hesistate to give feedback.
 
LizardWizard said:
$$\psi(t)=e^{-iEt/\hbar}$$
It should be ##\psi(t)=e^{-iHt/\hbar}\psi(0)##, with ##\psi(0) = |u_3\rangle## (##|u_3\rangle## is the eigenket of ##A## correponding to eigenvalue ##-a##) as given by the problem. Next, make use of the completeness relation for the eigenkets of ##H##,
$$
\sum_{n=1}^3 |e_n\rangle \langle e_n| = 1
$$
with ##|e_n\rangle## the eigenket of ##H##, and place it somewhere in ##e^{-iHt/\hbar}\psi(0)## such that the exponential operator can act on ##|e_n\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LizardWizard
If the solution lies in having the eigenvectors of H act on ##\psi(t)## then I have, for the first example $$|e_1>=[1 0 0]$$$$|e_2>=[0 -1 1]$$$$|e_1>=[0 1 1]$$
from these ##|e_2>## would lead to the solution I am given, but would the other eigenvectors also lead to valid solutions? The same happens with the second example.
 
LizardWizard said:
from these |e2>|e2>|e_2> would lead to the solution I am given, but would the other eigenvectors also lead to valid solutions?
I don't know what you mean by ##|e_2\rangle## being the only eigenvector of ##H## which contributes to the answer. Using the completeness relation above, I have checked that ##|e_3\rangle## also contributes.
By the way, the eigenvectors you have there must first be normalized, otherwise, the completeness relation won't work.
 
I see, could you psot your solution then perhaps?
 
In PF, the helper is only allowed to guide the OP towards the correct answer without providing the final answer.
What about your own try, what did you get after properly utilizing the completeness relation in the equation ##\psi(t)=e^{-iHt/\hbar}|u_3\rangle##?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LizardWizard
Ok, I understand. I'll go try it one more time now and see if it works out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K