MHB Finding the Value of a Compounded Annuity Fund

  • Thread starter Thread starter alane1994
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annuity Value
alane1994
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A high school mathematics teacher puts \(\$\)2000 into an annuity fund and then contributes \(\$\)1800 per year into the fund for the next 30 years by making small weekly contributions. (We assume weekly contributions are close enough to continuous deposits so that we may use a differential equation model.) The fund grows at a rate of 7.5% per year.

(a) Write a differential equation that models the growth of this fund using \(m(t)\) for the amount of money present in the fund.
(b) How much money will be in the fund after 30 years according to this model.

I feel confident that I can solve (b)

I am confused because 7.5% isn't an interest rate or anything...

------EDIT------

When I try and put it into

\(Pe^{rt}\)

It doesn't come out right, I am completely baffled as to how to proceed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would take the 7.5% annual growth to be due to interest. So, we have two things contributing to the growth of the fund...the weekly contributions (which we are told to model as continuous) resulting in an annual growth and the annual growth due to interest. We are also given an initial value. Can you put all of this together to get an IVP that models the situation?
 
Hmm...

For a continuous growth rate, would we have?

\(\displaystyle \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}(1+\frac{0.75}{n})^{n}\)

1.07788
so r = .07788 perhaps?
 
What you want to do is write an IVP consisting of an ODE that describes how $m(t)$ (in dollars) changes with time $t$ (in years), and the initial amount present in the account:

$$\frac{dm}{dt}=\text{annual contributions}+\text{annual growth from interest earned}$$ where $$m(0)=\text{initial investment}$$

We are told the annual contributions total \$1800, and the initial investment is \$2000. Now, the annual growth from interest will be a function of $m(t)$...:D
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K