Finding the Value of Theta in Simple Harmonic Motion - Explanation and Solution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the value of theta (θ) in the context of simple harmonic motion, particularly focusing on the oscillation about a specific equilibrium position. Participants are exploring the relationship between θ and the equilibrium angle φ, as well as the implications of acceleration on these values.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the value about which θ oscillates, questioning whether it corresponds to α or another value. There are discussions about the equilibrium position of the pendulum and how it relates to the angles θ and φ.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and suggestions for approaching the problem, while others are exploring the implications of their findings. There is an ongoing examination of the definitions and relationships between the angles involved, but no consensus has been reached on the final interpretation.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need to consider the effects of acceleration on the equilibrium position and the definitions of the angles involved. Some participants express uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the angles and their relationships.

Faiq
Messages
347
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


The question is uploaded.
SHM.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution


I have completed the whole question, however, stuck on the last part.
How to find the value about which ## \rm \small \theta## now oscillates?
A source stated that ## \rm \small \alpha## is the value about which ## \rm \small \theta## is oscillating. Can anybody tell me if that is correct? If yes, then why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What value of ##\phi## does the pendulum oscillate about?
 
TSny said:
What value of ##\phi## does the pendulum oscillate about?
I am not sure about the answer to your question. All I know is that the value of ##\theta## is technically the "amplitude" of the motion.
 
What value of ##\phi## corresponds to the equilibrium position of the pendulum. See equation [2].
 
##\theta##?
If yes? Can you tell why?
 
Maybe I got this.
Before the acceleration, the ##7/24 cos\theta## term wasn't present. Thus if I consider, the before acceleration state as equilibrium then ##\theta## is the value that corresponds to equilibrium. But after applying the acceleration, the ##7/24 cos\theta## term emerged which gave rise to the ##-\alpha## value. As a result, the ##-\alpha## value must be the maximum amplitude or the value about which ##\phi## oscillates.
Rearranging the equation, we get that ##\theta ## oscillates about the value of ##\alpha##.
Correct?
 
Hint: Usually when you want to arrive at a result of the form trig(a - b) where "trig" is one of the trig functions, you are looking to employ one of the trig angle sum or difference identities in some fashion...
 
gneill said:
Hint: Usually when you want to arrive at a result of the form trig(a - b) where "trig" is one of the trig functions, you are looking to employ one of the trig angle sum or difference identities in some fashion...
Apologies but I can't seem to relate your hint with my current confusion.
 
Start with the expression:

##g~\left( sin(θ) - 7~cos(θ) \right)##

You need to get it into a form where the sin(a - b) identity can be applied. That will mean massaging the expression until the coefficients of the existing sin(θ) and cos(θ) are the cosine and sine of some new angle, ##\alpha##.
 
  • #10
gneill said:
Start with the expression:

##g~\left( sin(θ) - 7~cos(θ) \right)##

You need to get it into a form where the sin(a - b) identity can be applied. That will mean massaging the expression until the coefficients of the existing sin(θ) and cos(θ) are the cosine and sine of some new angle, ##\alpha##.
Yes, I did all of that and also obtained the correct expression ## \rm \small -g\sin(\theta - 16.3) ##
I am just stuck at "the value at which theta oscillates"? I mean why the value of alpha is the value at which theta oscillates?
Is this explanation correct?
Before the acceleration, the ##7/24 cos\theta## term wasn't present. Thus if I consider, the before acceleration state as equilibrium then ##\theta## is the value that corresponds to equilibrium. But after applying the acceleration, the ##7/24 cos\theta## term emerged which gave rise to the ##-\alpha## value. As a result, the ##-\alpha## value must be the maximum amplitude or the value about which ##\phi## oscillates.
Rearranging the equation, we get that ##\theta ## oscillates about the value of ##\alpha##.
 
  • #11
Faiq said:
Thus if I consider, the before acceleration state as equilibrium then ##\theta## is the value that corresponds to equilibrium.
Try to be precise in how you state things. ##\theta## is a variable, so it cannot correspond to equilibrium. There is a specific value of ##\theta## that corresponds to equilibrium.

First, find the value of ##\phi## that corresponds to equilibrium. If the pendulum hangs at rest in the equilibrium position, what is the value of ##\frac{d^2 \phi}{dt^2}##?

Then, what does equation [2] imply for the value of ##\phi## at equilibrium?
 
  • #12
TSny said:
Try to be precise in how you state things. ##\theta## is a variable, so it cannot correspond to equilibrium. There is a specific value of ##\theta## that corresponds to equilibrium.

First, find the value of ##\phi## that corresponds to equilibrium. If the pendulum hangs at rest in the equilibrium position, what is the value of ##\frac{d^2 \phi}{dt^2}##?

Then, what does equation [2] imply for the value of ##\phi## at equilibrium?
Well if the pendulum is in equilibrium and hangs in free fall, then ##\phi=0## and then ## \small \frac{d^2\phi}{dt^2}## should be equal to 0.
I get the meaning of your second question but unfortunately, I don't know the answer. Maybe ##-\alpha## because ##\theta## keeps changing.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Faiq said:
Well if the pendulum is in equilibrium and hangs in free fall, then θ=0
Did you mean φ=0?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
Did you mean φ=0?
Oh yes.
 
  • #15
Faiq said:
Well if the pendulum is in equilibrium and hangs in free fall, then ##\theta=0## and then ## \small \frac{d^2\phi}{dt^2}## should be equal to 0.
Your equation is ##\ddot \phi=k\sin(\phi)##. For what value of φ will ##\ddot \phi## be zero?
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
Your equation is ##\ddot \phi=k\sin(\phi)##. For what value of φ will ##\ddot \phi## be zero?
## \phi = 2k\pi ## but since in this question ## \phi ## is a small angle so ## \phi = 0 ##
 
  • #17
Faiq said:
## \phi = 2k\pi ## but since in this question ## \phi ## is a small angle so ## \phi = 0 ##
Right. (I see you edited your post #14 after my post #15.)
So what does that give for θ at equilibrium?
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
Right. (I see you edited your post #14 after my post #15.)
So what does that give for θ at equilibrium?
Yes it gives ##\theta = \alpha##
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Faiq said:
Yes it gives ##\theta = \alpha##
Ok. All done?
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
Ok. All done?
Is this explanation correct?
WhatsApp Image 2017-04-11 at 4.43.09 AM.jpeg
 
  • #21
upload_2017-4-11_18-34-47.png

Your top right diagram indicates that ##\theta## is measured from the new equilibrium position. But, ##\theta## is defined to be the angle of the pendulum measured from the old equilibrium position (i.e., from the vertical position). ##\phi## is the angle of the pendulum as measured from the new equilibrium position.
upload_2017-4-11_18-36-4.png

What angle is indicated by the blue angle?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K