Finding x when Elastic Potential Energy equals Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the position of a mass oscillating on a spring when its elastic potential energy equals its kinetic energy. The relevant equations are Us = 0.5*k*x^2 for potential energy and K = 0.5*m*v^2 for kinetic energy. The key insight is that mechanical energy is conserved, allowing the relationship ME = 0.5*k*A^2 at maximum displacement to be equated with the sum of kinetic and potential energy at any other point. The correct approach involves setting 0.5*k*x^2 equal to 0.5*m*v^2 and applying conservation of mechanical energy to find the displacement x in terms of amplitude A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants (k)
  • Familiarity with the concepts of kinetic and potential energy
  • Knowledge of mechanical energy conservation principles
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mechanical energy conservation in oscillatory systems
  • Learn how to derive relationships between kinetic and potential energy in harmonic motion
  • Explore the implications of amplitude (A) on energy distribution in spring systems
  • Investigate the role of mass (m) and spring constant (k) in determining oscillation characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding oscillatory motion and energy conservation in spring systems.

rkelley7891
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem I've been working on:
"A mass is oscillating with amplitude A at the end of a spring. How far (in terms of A) is this mass from the equilibrium position of the spring when the elastic potential energy equals the kinetic energy?"


Now I know that Us = 0.5*k*x^2 and K = 0.5*m*v^2.

I first thought that the answer would be .5 (half of A) since that would be halfway between fully stretched and at equilibrium, then I thought maybe at equilibrium, but neither worked. I also then tried to set the two equations equal to one another, but can't go anywhere with this. Any ideas? This is a fairly simple question that is completely stumping me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rkelley7891 said:
I also then tried to set the two equations equal to one another, but can't go anywhere with this. Any ideas? This is a fairly simple question that is completely stumping me...

That's what you should do. How far did you get? Try again. Don't forget that mechanical energy is conserved, which means that the ME at the point where potential energy is equal to the kinetic energy, the total ME is the same as at the point where the kinetic energy is zero, i.e. the point where all the mechanical energy is in the form of potential energy.
 
Ok, so I tried setting 0.5kx^2 = 0.5mv^2, and end up with x = sqrt(mv/k), which tells me nothing because I don't know v, m, or k. I tried using conservation of mechanical energy by saying MEi = 0.5kxi^2 + 0 (which means there's only potential energy in the system) and MEf = 0.5kxf^2 + 0.5mvf^2, and setting MEi = MEf, but still got nowhere... grr...
 
When you use mechanical energy conservation, you say that the sum of kinetic plus potential energy at one point is the same as kinetic plus potential energy at another point. I am sure you know this but you are not applying it correctly.

When the mechanical energy is all in the potential energy form at displacement x = A, you have

ME = (1/2)kA2 where A is the amplitude.

When the kinetic energy is equal to the potential energy at displacement x < A

ME = (1/2)kx2 + (1/2)mv2

Now you set KE = PE in the last expression and demand that the ME at displacement x be the same as the ME at x = A. That's mechanical energy conservation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K