Fine structure correction in H atom

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the fine structure correction in the hydrogen atom as presented in Griffiths' textbook. The user questions whether Griffiths incorrectly states that fine structure breaks the degeneracy in the orbital quantum number l while preserving it in the total angular momentum j. They argue that the fine structure correction formula indicates dependence on j rather than l, suggesting that different j values lead to varying corrections. A reference to an earlier edition of the textbook is provided, which seems to clarify the relationship between energy levels and the quantum numbers n and j. The user seeks confirmation on whether this discrepancy is a typo or a misunderstanding.
McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I refer to the second edition (international edition) of Griffiths. He proves that the total fine structure correction (spin orbital plus relativistic) is given by

E_{fs}^{1}\propto (3-\frac{4n}{j+1/2})

After that, he writes this. "Fine structure breaks the degeneracy in l (that is, for a given n, the different allowed values of l do not all carry the same energy) but preserves the degeneracy in j"

Isn't he mixing up l and j? From the relation, it appears that fine structure correction depends on j and not on l. So for a given n, different j values end up with different corrections while the degenracy in l is preserved. Or have I made a mistake in understanding what he is saying? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So anybody knows if this is a typo in the text or if I've got it wrong? Thank you
 
McLaren Rulez said:
So anybody knows if this is a typo in the text or if I've got it wrong? Thank you

interestingly enough (or not!) in the 1995 edition page 242 the text reads:

"... Fine structure breaks the degeneracy in l (that is, for a given n, the different allowed values of l do not all carry the same energy); the energies are determined by n and j (see Figure 6.9)..."

which maybe makes a bit more sense!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K