Finite Dimensionality of Endomorphism Ring in Simple Modules?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bleys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    module Ring
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Bleys
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Let R be a finite dimensional C-algebra (C=Complex numbers) and S a simple R-module. Why does it follow that [itex]End_{R}(S)[/itex] is also finite dimensional (as C-vector spaces, I'm guessing)? I'm not really sure how to construct a basis for it using one of S, and there's probably another reason for it (is end(S) embedded in S or something?)
 
on Phys.org
yes; I have this result
"For a finite dimensional C-algebra R, there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of simple R-modules and they are finite dimensional"
 
Perfect. So S is a finite-dimensional C-vector space and End_R(S) is a subspace of End_C(S), hence is finite-dimensional over C. In fact, you can use Schur's lemma to show that End_R(S) is one-dimensional.
 
ah of course, I didn't think of the fact End_{R}(S) is a subspace of End_{C}(S).
I'm actually going through Schur's Lemma's proof to show End_R(S) is isomorphic to C but this was the detail I wasn't understanding.

Thank you, morphism!