Finite Dimensionality of Endomorphism Ring in Simple Modules?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bleys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    module Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the context of finite dimensional C-algebras, if R is a finite dimensional C-algebra and S is a simple R-module, then the endomorphism ring End_{R}(S) is also finite dimensional as a C-vector space. This conclusion is supported by the fact that S is a finite-dimensional C-vector space, and End_{R}(S) is a subspace of End_{C}(S). Utilizing Schur's lemma, it can be established that End_{R}(S) is one-dimensional, confirming that it is isomorphic to C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite dimensional C-algebras
  • Knowledge of simple R-modules
  • Familiarity with endomorphism rings
  • Comprehension of Schur's lemma
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of finite dimensional C-algebras
  • Explore the structure of simple R-modules
  • Learn about endomorphism rings in module theory
  • Review the proof and applications of Schur's lemma
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and graduate students focusing on representation theory and module theory, particularly those interested in the properties of endomorphism rings in finite dimensional algebras.

Bleys
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Let R be a finite dimensional C-algebra (C=Complex numbers) and S a simple R-module. Why does it follow that End_{R}(S) is also finite dimensional (as C-vector spaces, I'm guessing)? I'm not really sure how to construct a basis for it using one of S, and there's probably another reason for it (is end(S) embedded in S or something?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is S finitely generated over R (hence C)?
 
yes; I have this result
"For a finite dimensional C-algebra R, there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of simple R-modules and they are finite dimensional"
 
Perfect. So S is a finite-dimensional C-vector space and End_R(S) is a subspace of End_C(S), hence is finite-dimensional over C. In fact, you can use Schur's lemma to show that End_R(S) is one-dimensional.
 
ah of course, I didn't think of the fact End_{R}(S) is a subspace of End_{C}(S).
I'm actually going through Schur's Lemma's proof to show End_R(S) is isomorphic to C but this was the detail I wasn't understanding.

Thank you, morphism!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
937
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K