Finite subgroups of unique orders are normal

  • Thread starter Thread starter redone632
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Normal
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
redone632
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G be a finite group and H a subgroup of G having order m. Show that if H is the only subgroup of order m in G, then H is normal in G.


Homework Equations


A subgroup [itex]H[/itex] of [itex]G[/itex] is normal in [itex]G[/itex] if and only if [itex]xHx^{-1} \subseteq H \forall x \in G[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose that H is the only subgroup of order m. Then elements in G\H cannot have order m.

If [itex]x \in H[/itex] then clearly, [itex]xHx^{-1} \subseteq H[/itex]

If [itex]x \notin H[/itex] that is, [itex]x \in G \backslash H[/itex] so [itex]|x| \neq m[/itex] then ...

This is where I'm not seeing anything. Any help to point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dick said:
Is xHx^(-1) a subgroup? How many elements does it have?

Since H is a subgroup of order m, xHx^(-1) will be a subgroup of order m. Since H is the only subgroup of order m there will be no other subgroup such that xKx^(-1) is of order m. Therefore, xHx^(-1) = H.

I think that's it, but I can't connect the dots to the last statement.
 
I don't see the problem. If xHx^(-1) is a subgroup of order m, and H is the ONLY subgroup of order m, then xHx^(-1) must be the same subgroup as H. What's K got to do with it?
 
Dick said:
I don't see the problem. If xHx^(-1) is a subgroup of order m, and H is the ONLY subgroup of order m, then xHx^(-1) must be the same subgroup as H. What's K got to do with it?

Oh wow, I swear I miss the most obvious things. Thanks for your help again!