MHB Firedawn's questions at Yahoo Answers regarding minimizing cost of pipeline

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around optimizing the cost of laying a pipeline from a powerhouse to an island, considering that underwater installation is 1.4 times more expensive than overland. The problem is mathematically framed, with a cost function derived based on the distances involved. The optimal distance for the pipeline to minimize costs is calculated to be approximately 5.1 km from point A. The solution involves differentiating the cost function and confirming the minimum through the second derivative test. This approach effectively clarifies the confusion surrounding the optimization question.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calc - Optimization? Confusing question...?


I don't understand what this question is asking:
A pipeline needs to be connect from a powerhouse to an island. The island is 5 km away from the nearest point, A on a straight shore line. The powerhouse is 13 km away from point A. If it costs 1.4 times as much to lay the pipeline underwater as it does over land, how should the pipe be laid to minimize the cost?

The ans is 5.1 km from A.

What is this question asking me? I'm so confused.
How would I approach this?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Firedawn,

Let's first draw a diagram of the path of the pipeline. All distances are in kilometers.

View attachment 1754

The powerhouse is at $\text{P}$, and the island is at $\text{I}$. The path of the pipeline is drawn in red. Let $C$ be the cost to lay the pipeline over land. The total cost is the cost per unit length time the total length, hence we may express the total cost as a function of $x$ as follows:

$$C(x)=C(13-x)+\frac{7}{5}C\sqrt{x^2+5^2}$$

Differentiating with respect to $x$ and equating the result to zero, we obtain:

$$C'(x)=-C+\frac{7}{5}C\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+5^2}}=0$$

Multiply through by $$\frac{5\sqrt{x^2+5^2}}{C}$$

$$-5\sqrt{x^2+5^2}+7x=0$$

$$7x=5\sqrt{x^2+5^2}$$

Square both sides:

$$49x^2=25x^2+625$$

$$x^2=\frac{625}{24}$$

Take the positive root:

$$x=\frac{25}{12}\sqrt{6}\approx5.10310363079829$$

To determine the nature of the extremum associated with this critical value, we may use the second derivative test:

$$C'(x)=-C+\frac{7}{5}C\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+5^2}}=0$$

$$C''(x)=0+\frac{7}{5}C\frac{\sqrt{x^2+5^2}(1)-x\left(\dfrac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+5^2}} \right)}{\left(\sqrt{x^2+5^2} \right)^2}=\frac{35C}{\left(x^2+5^2 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}$$

We see that for all real $x$ the second derivative is positive, hence our critical value is at the global minimum.
 

Attachments

  • firedawn.jpg
    firedawn.jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 113
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top