First autonomous drone attack on humans (alleged by the UN)

  • Thread starter Thread starter sbrothy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drone
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The UN has reported that during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, an STM Kargu autonomous kamikaze drone executed an attack on Haftar's forces in Libya without human command, marking it as the first autonomous drone strike in history. This incident raises significant ethical and operational questions regarding the classification of autonomous weapons, especially in comparison to traditional munitions like landmines and anti-radiation missiles. The discussion highlights the ongoing debate about the implications of autonomous weaponry and the potential need for regulatory measures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of autonomous weapon systems
  • Familiarity with drone technology, specifically STM Kargu
  • Knowledge of international military conflicts, particularly the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war
  • Awareness of ethical considerations in warfare and autonomous systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational capabilities of STM Kargu drones
  • Examine the legal frameworks surrounding autonomous weapons
  • Explore the implications of AI in military applications
  • Investigate historical precedents of autonomous weapon usage
USEFUL FOR

Military strategists, defense technology researchers, policymakers, and anyone interested in the ethical implications of autonomous weapon systems in modern warfare.

sbrothy
Gold Member
Messages
1,422
Reaction score
1,268
It may be old news but it still kinda sends a chill down my spine.During the "recent" 2020 war in Nargorno-Karabakh appearently the UN claims that an STM Kargu autonomous kamikaze drone loaded with explosives detected and attacked Haftar's forces in Libya with its artificial intelligence without command. It is considered the first drone attack in history carried out by a loitering munition on it's "own" initiative.Hello Skynet! :)

EDIT: I'm a little behind because this conflict didnt receive much coverage where I live.
EDIT2: And funnily enough the war was appearently fought over Covid-19 restrictions!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
sbrothy said:
It is considered the first drone attack in history carried out by a loitering munition on it's "own" initiative.
I'd be curious to try to dissect how they split the hair to declare this the first, vs the many autonomous drones/weapons we've had and used for decades.

I suppose land and sea mines don't qualify for some reason? Autonomous anti-radiation missiles?
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, Bystander, Vanadium 50 and 2 others
russ_watters said:
I'd be curious to try to dissect how they split the hair to declare this the first, vs the many autonomous drones/weapons we've had and used for decades.

I suppose land and sea mines don't qualify for some reason? Autonomous anti-radiation missiles?
Yeah. I'm also pretty sure that the people who were killed don't really care about the distinction., autonomous weapons has been around since the eighties. Still, aot of debate is appereantly going on these days about whether to ban them. Fat chance.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
sbrothy said:
It may be old news but it still kinda sends a chill down my spine.During the "recent" 2020 war in Nargorno-Karabakh appearently the UN claims that an STM Kargu autonomous kamikaze drone loaded with explosives detected and attacked Haftar's forces in Libya with its artificial intelligence without command. It is considered the first drone attack in history carried out by a loitering munition on it's "own" initiative.
s!
The locations are mixed up - what does Nargorno-Karabakh (which is a disputed region in the Caucuses) have to do with Libya?

A landmine is a 'loitering' munition - and unlike a drone cannot easily be turned off - so maybe this is a lesser evil? I don't really see the distinction between launching a 'dumb' missile and a drone that will seek and attack some random target.
 
BWV said:
A landmine is a 'loitering' munition - and unlike a drone cannot easily be turned off - so maybe this is a lesser evil?
I think so. The purpose of most automation and/or "smart" technology I can think of is efficiency (and this can be expanded backwards in time/technology somewhat). More effectively hitting your target means less munitions used and less collateral damage. It has enabled changes in tactics and laws of war that have unquestionably led to smaller, shorter, safer and more decisive wars. A cynic could say safety is an unintended biproduct, but it's very real regardless.

There is always a risk (certainty?) that new tech will be used by our enemies, terrorists or even ordinary criminals, and this tech is already dropping into that domain:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Caracas_drone_attack

But I don't get allusions to Skynet/War Games/Strangelove. This isn't the same system as that. Those are AI strategic control systems, not individual weapons. They are fundamentally different in purpose/scope.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BWV