First Year Physics: Is My Study Plan Effective?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of a study plan for a first-year calculus-based physics course. Participants share their methods and opinions on note-taking, problem-solving, and overall study strategies, exploring various approaches to learning physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the efficiency of their study plan, specifically the time spent on detailed note-taking without practicing problems.
  • Another suggests a structured approach: making notes, doing problems, and utilizing online resources like MIT's open courseware, emphasizing the importance of focusing on weaker topics.
  • A participant shares their experience of not taking notes from the textbook, preferring to note what the professor says that isn't covered in the book for efficiency.
  • One contributor argues that taking notes may be less beneficial for physics compared to subjects like biology, advocating for a focus on interpretation and problem-solving instead.
  • Another participant emphasizes that detailed notes from textbooks may detract from learning, suggesting that lecture notes should take precedence and that problem-solving is crucial for understanding physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on the effectiveness of note-taking and study strategies, with no consensus reached on the best approach. Some advocate for detailed notes while others argue against them, highlighting differing opinions on learning methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants' suggestions are based on personal experiences and may depend on individual learning styles and the teaching methods of their instructors. The discussion reflects a variety of assumptions about the role of note-taking and problem-solving in mastering physics concepts.

Jacobalg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is my first year taking a physics course and i am taking calculus based physics. My study plan so far has been writing detailed notes from the book and each section would take me a good hour. I have not done the practice problems just yet as i have two more sections to finish. Is this wasting time ? if so what method should i use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Make notes for a section.
2. do the problems for that section.
3. Move to next section.
4. Watch MIT's open courseware videos. They are good. Walter Lewin is a champ.
5. Ask questions on the forums for additional help.

Don't forget to ask your professor for help too. And ask around about study groups.IMO, for efficiency, I would focus on topics which are your weakest. If you know how to do vector addition, don't worry about notes and problems for that section. Focus on what you have trouble with.
 
me to

i am doing my undergraduate in physics in a reputed university in India
i don't no what my possibilities are ?
help me to get a internship so that i have more of a professional knowledge
 
Jacobalg said:
This is my first year taking a physics course and i am taking calculus based physics. My study plan so far has been writing detailed notes from the book and each section would take me a good hour. I have not done the practice problems just yet as i have two more sections to finish. Is this wasting time ? if so what method should i use?

I don't really take notes from the textbook. I usually read the chapter before the lecture and take notes of whatever the professor says that wasn't in the textbook. That makes my work much more efficient.
 
IMHO, taking notes for physics is a waste of time. I think taking notes is more appropriate for a biology course where you have to absorb a lot of information. Here, the amount of information is sparse, what's important is your interpretation of that information.

By the way, taking notes can mean lots of things. The type of note-taking I do is copying the mathematical derivations and thinking them through along with the author. That type of note taking I would say is quite nice.

What I would do is try to masticate these ideas in every way possible. Whenever you have a wrong approach to a problem, prove why this approach was incorrect. In my experience, I can't stress enough how important right-interpretation is. Also, do lots of problems.

Good luck.
 
If you have a competent instructor there is no need to take detailed notes from a book. In fact, I would say that would detract from your learning experience. Your notes should consist mostly of what was discussed in lecture. Reading the book comes next but only to reinforce what was taught in lecture (you mostly skim it or read it if it doesn't take too long).

In physics, problems are emphasized more (at least where I attend school) primarily because that is how you will learn the actual physics. Do easy problems, and once you build up your competence (i.e. confidence in understanding) of the easier problems you should tackle the harder problems.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K