Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around methods for fitting a dataset of the form z = f(x,y) to a quadratic surface represented by the equation z = Ax² + Bxy + Cy² + Dx + Ey + F. Participants explore the possibility of simpler, non-iterative methods for this fitting process, contrasting it with standard numerical methods like Levenberg-Marquardt and Gauss-Newton.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that fitting a quadratic surface can be approached similarly to linear regression, where the coefficients A to F can be evaluated without iterative methods.
- Others argue that fitting inherently involves optimization, which typically requires iterative algorithms, and question how one would assess the quality of a fit without such methods.
- A participant mentions that polynomial regression can be treated as linear regression in terms of the coefficients, despite the non-linear nature of the function itself.
- There is a reference to literature on the subject of fitting quadratic surfaces, indicating that various methods exist, although specifics are not detailed.
- Some participants clarify that the fitting process involves minimizing a specific function related to the residuals of the data points, which can be approached through solving linear equations.
- One participant highlights the concept of "Total least squares" fitting, which may be relevant when considering measurement errors in the dataset.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the feasibility of non-iterative methods for fitting quadratic surfaces, with some asserting that it is possible while others maintain that optimization typically requires iterative approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of a one-step fitting formula.
Contextual Notes
Participants note that the fitting process may depend on the specific definitions and assumptions made about the data and the fitting criteria, which are not fully explored in the discussion.