Flipping Limits in Integrals: Is it Valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kat007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary
Flipping the limits of integration from (x) to positive infinity to (minus infinity) to (minus x) is generally not valid unless the integrand is an even function. In this case, the integrand is the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of a standard normal distribution, which is an even function. Therefore, the limits can be flipped, and the signs will also change accordingly. This specific scenario confirms the validity of the limit transformation. Understanding the properties of the integrand is crucial in determining the correctness of such integral manipulations.
Kat007
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Could you please tell me is it correct to say this:
If I have integral with lower limit of (x) and upper limit of (positive infinity), does it equal to
integral of lower limit (minus infinity) and upper limit (minus x)?

Do you know of any link to a website showing such a rule?

Thank you,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Kat007 said:
Hello,

Could you please tell me is it correct to say this:
If I have integral with lower limit of (x) and upper limit of (positive infinity), does it equal to
integral of lower limit (minus infinity) and upper limit (minus x)?

Do you know of any link to a website showing such a rule?

Thank you,
In general, there's no such rule. However, if the integrand is an even function (i.e., f(-x) = f(x) for all real x), what you're asking about is true.
 
Hi Mike,

Thank you, yes, this is the case. The integrand is the cdf of a standard normal with limits of a +ve constant on the bottom and positive infinity of the top. Then the limits flip and the signs also.

Thank you again!
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K