Flower power - embarras de richesse

  • Thread starter Marzena
  • Start date
231
154
niezapominajki.jpg


domowy_marzena.jpg


dzwonek_marzena.jpg


fiol_marzena.jpg


mieszaniec.jpg


oczka_marzena.jpg


oset_marzena.jpg


rozowy_marzena.jpg


slonecznik_marzena.jpg


srodek_marzena.jpg


van_marzena.jpg


zoltlica_marzena.jpg


zolty_marzena.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
351
2
I loved the first three ones and second last :!!)

What are those in the first one? (Never saw them before :()
 
Last edited:

turbo

Gold Member
3,028
45
Wonderful shots, all, Marzena! You and Andre might be in for a fight to the death.

Here are some bluets. Tiny guys, not even 1/4" across.

bluets.jpg
 

Borek

Mentor
28,013
2,518
Just realized - there was a typo in the url and the picture was not showing.

Vangogish :smile:

She has more and she can't make her mind, just like Andre...

Edit: thank you Kurdt :smile:
 
Last edited:

lisab

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,832
615
Wow! Like in Andre's thread, I can't decide.
 

Kurdt

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,769
6
Nice shots :smile:
 
M

misgfool

Pardon me for my ignorance, but what exactly makes these pictures interesting?
 

lisab

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,832
615
Pardon me for my ignorance, but what exactly makes these pictures interesting?
I guess to really get what's involved, you'd have to try to take a pic like this, of something really close-up. It's surprisingly difficult!
 

Borek

Mentor
28,013
2,518
It is not that they are especially interesting (although some details catched are quite surprising), but Marzena has to select one for the Flower power competition - and they are all worth using.
 
M

misgfool

I guess to really get what's involved, you'd have to try to take a pic like this, of something really close-up. It's surprisingly difficult!
I don't doubt that, but... so all these competitions are about picture taking technique?
 

Kurdt

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,769
6
Don't the picture comp rules state that no photo that has been previously uploaded on the site can be used? Doesn't this thread mean you've disqualified them all? :tongue2:

EDIT: Ahh only one use in a contest. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

turbo

Gold Member
3,028
45
I don't doubt that, but... so all these competitions are about picture taking technique?
Technique, composition, artistic sense... They all play into the competition. Depending on the focal length, aperture, shutter speed, and available or filled light, results can range from flat and dull to wonderful.

For instance, if you use a large aperture, you generally get a shallower depth of field, meaning that things closer or farther than your point of focus (the subject) end up more or less out-of focus. You can use this effect to accent and isolate your subject, and you can over-use it to the point where the effect gets to be a bit "much". Some subjects really require a bit of context and use of an overly-shallow DOF can detract.
 
3,073
3
Thanks for testing out my new monitor, Marzena, and providing some beauty in my day.

Are these digital or film shots?
 
231
154
Digital, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7.
 
M

misgfool

Technique, composition, artistic sense... They all play into the competition. Depending on the focal length, aperture, shutter speed, and available or filled light, results can range from flat and dull to wonderful.
Maybe I have misunderstood this, but shouldn't art try to convey some message?
 

turbo

Gold Member
3,028
45
Maybe I have misunderstood this, but shouldn't art try to convey some message?
Sometimes "art" is what one finds appealing, apart from any "message". When I see a well-composed image of a flower with interesting lighting, etc, I don't try to ascribe any meaning to it, any more than I would try to ascribe some meaning to the composition "Classical Gas". Just enjoy it for what it is.
 
i'm not a big fan of art as message/politics. beauty is universal. the poorer the art, the more message it needs to sell.
 

turbo

Gold Member
3,028
45
i'm not a big fan of art as message/politics. beauty is universal. the poorer the art, the more message it needs to sell.
Astute observation. The concept that "the artist was trying to convey this" is often pushed by critics. I can look at Van Gogh's "Starry Night" or "Sunflowers" without trying to ascribe some motive to them apart from the artist's joy in the creative process. Lots of art was subsidized by wealthy patrons centuries ago, but much of the stuff that captures our imaginations was avante-garde, stuff done for the love of it. Vincent was floored when he found out that he was making a living (just barely!) because his brother Theo was quietly buying his paintings and stacking them under his bed.
 
Astute observation. The concept that "the artist was trying to convey this" is often pushed by critics. I can look at Van Gogh's "Starry Night" or "Sunflowers" without trying to ascribe some motive to them apart from the artist's joy in the creative process. Lots of art was subsidized by wealthy patrons centuries ago, but much of the stuff that captures our imaginations was avante-garde, stuff done for the love of it. Vincent was floored when he found out that he was making a living (just barely!) because his brother Theo was quietly buying his paintings and stacking them under his bed.
lol, that's another sign of a great artist. no one appreciates you until you're dead!

actually, i think a lot of it is simply art dealers conning buyers.
 
M

misgfool

i'm not a big fan of art as message/politics. beauty is universal. the poorer the art, the more message it needs to sell.
I can't see beauty in a static 2D picture, when I have seen and felt the real thing. You would have to have really unique and special (new) object for a picture to have any value. So you really need the message. Or maybe beauty isn't universal after all.
 
I can't see beauty in a static 2D picture, when I have seen and felt the real thing. You would have to have really unique and special (new) object for a picture to have any value. So you really need the message. Or maybe beauty isn't universal after all.
not all art is of real things. is there really no art that pleases you?
 
M

misgfool

not all art is of real things. is there really no art that pleases you?
Of course there is. I love an intellectually stimulating story, message or beauty with novelty.
 
Of course there is. I love an intellectually stimulating story, message or beauty with novelty.
i should've clarified. visual arts, not prose and poetry.
 
M

misgfool

i should've clarified. visual arts, not prose and poetry.
When I was in school, we were taught that a picture says more than a thousand words. Visual art is as much of an story as is a written one. It is just an alternative way of expression.
 

Related Threads for: Flower power - embarras de richesse

  • Poll
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
91
Views
13K
  • Posted
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top