Flywheel moment of inertia(torque)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Latios1314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flywheel Moment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in the lower segment of a drive belt connected to a flywheel driven by an electric motor. The flywheel, a solid disk with a mass of 80.0 kg and a diameter of 1.25 m, experiences a clockwise angular acceleration of 1.67 rad/s². The tension in the upper segment of the belt is 135 N, leading to a calculated tension of 21.5 N in the lower segment. The participants clarify that the torque about the pulley and flywheel is the same due to their shared center of rotation, despite the flywheel's greater moment of inertia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and moment of inertia in rotational dynamics
  • Familiarity with angular acceleration and its implications
  • Basic knowledge of electric motor operation and mechanical systems
  • Ability to apply Newton's laws to rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of moment of inertia in composite bodies
  • Study the effects of pulley mass on torque calculations
  • Learn about the dynamics of belt-driven systems in mechanical engineering
  • Investigate the relationship between linear and angular motion in physics
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of rotational systems and belt-driven machinery.

Latios1314
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
An electric motor turns a flywheel through a drive belt that joins a pulley on the motor
and a pulley that is rigidly attached to the flywheel, as shown in Figure P10.39. The flywheel is a solid disk with a mass of 80.0 kg and a diameter of 1.25 m. It turns on a frictionless axle. Its pulley has much smaller mass and a radius of 0.230 m. If the tension in the upper (taut) segment of the belt is 135 N and the flywheel has a clockwise angular acceleration of 1.67 rad/s2, find the tension in the lower (slack) segment of the belt.

Hi guys, I've managed to work this question via the method below.

torque about pulley = torque about flywheel
Tensile force x radius of pulley = moment of inertia of flywheel x angular acceleration
(T1 -T2) x radius= 0.5 x mass of flywheel x square of radius of flywheel x angular acceleration
(T1-135) 0.23 = 0.5 x 80 x 0.625^2 x 1.67
T1 =21.5N

However, can anyone explain to me why the torque about the pulley and flywheel would be the same?

Shouldn't the torque about the flywheel be greater due to its greater moment of inertia and similar angular acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Torque is taken to be applied around some center of rotation, and the center of rotation of the pulley and flywheel are one and the same.

Torque is the circular motion analog of force. Moment of inertia is the circular motion analog of mass. You don't expect an applied force to increase because it's applied to a more massive object; a force is whatever values it's specified to be. Similarly for torque

Now it's certainly true that it takes more force to produce a given acceleration if the mass is larger, but changing the mass doesn't automatically change the force; the force is applied by some outside agency that is separately specified. The same holds for circular motion and torque.

In the present problem the pulley is taken to be bonded to the flywheel and has negligible mass. So the two together are taken to have the same moment of inertia as the flywheel alone.
 
What if it is in the case where the pulley's mass isn't negligible?

How would things change if that is the case?
 
Latios1314 said:
What if it is in the case where the pulley's mass isn't negligible?

How would things change if that is the case?

If the pulley's mass is not negligible then you would add its moment of inertia to that of the flywheel and use this sum in the equations where previously you used just the moment of inertia of the flywheel.

To use a "linear" analogy, suppose you were told that a certain mass M is being pulled by a force applied via massless rope. The rope is attached via a metal ring that is bolted to M. If the mass of the ring is negligible then you just use M as the mass being accelerated by the force. If, on the other hand, you're told that the metal ring has mass m and cannot be ignored, then you'd take M+m as the mass being accelerated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K