Flywheel moment of inertia(torque)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Latios1314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flywheel Moment
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a flywheel connected to an electric motor via a pulley system, focusing on the calculation of tension in the belt segments and the relationship between torque and moment of inertia. The subject area includes rotational dynamics and torque analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to equate the torque about the pulley and the flywheel, raising questions about the implications of moment of inertia on torque. Some participants clarify that torque is defined around a center of rotation, which is the same for both the pulley and flywheel.
  • Further inquiries are made about scenarios where the pulley's mass is not negligible, prompting discussions on how to incorporate the pulley's moment of inertia into the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing clarifications on the relationship between torque and moment of inertia. There is exploration of different scenarios regarding the mass of the pulley, indicating a productive examination of the problem's assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the pulley's mass on the overall moment of inertia and the resulting calculations, highlighting the need for careful consideration of all components in the system.

Latios1314
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
An electric motor turns a flywheel through a drive belt that joins a pulley on the motor
and a pulley that is rigidly attached to the flywheel, as shown in Figure P10.39. The flywheel is a solid disk with a mass of 80.0 kg and a diameter of 1.25 m. It turns on a frictionless axle. Its pulley has much smaller mass and a radius of 0.230 m. If the tension in the upper (taut) segment of the belt is 135 N and the flywheel has a clockwise angular acceleration of 1.67 rad/s2, find the tension in the lower (slack) segment of the belt.

Hi guys, I've managed to work this question via the method below.

torque about pulley = torque about flywheel
Tensile force x radius of pulley = moment of inertia of flywheel x angular acceleration
(T1 -T2) x radius= 0.5 x mass of flywheel x square of radius of flywheel x angular acceleration
(T1-135) 0.23 = 0.5 x 80 x 0.625^2 x 1.67
T1 =21.5N

However, can anyone explain to me why the torque about the pulley and flywheel would be the same?

Shouldn't the torque about the flywheel be greater due to its greater moment of inertia and similar angular acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Torque is taken to be applied around some center of rotation, and the center of rotation of the pulley and flywheel are one and the same.

Torque is the circular motion analog of force. Moment of inertia is the circular motion analog of mass. You don't expect an applied force to increase because it's applied to a more massive object; a force is whatever values it's specified to be. Similarly for torque

Now it's certainly true that it takes more force to produce a given acceleration if the mass is larger, but changing the mass doesn't automatically change the force; the force is applied by some outside agency that is separately specified. The same holds for circular motion and torque.

In the present problem the pulley is taken to be bonded to the flywheel and has negligible mass. So the two together are taken to have the same moment of inertia as the flywheel alone.
 
What if it is in the case where the pulley's mass isn't negligible?

How would things change if that is the case?
 
Latios1314 said:
What if it is in the case where the pulley's mass isn't negligible?

How would things change if that is the case?

If the pulley's mass is not negligible then you would add its moment of inertia to that of the flywheel and use this sum in the equations where previously you used just the moment of inertia of the flywheel.

To use a "linear" analogy, suppose you were told that a certain mass M is being pulled by a force applied via massless rope. The rope is attached via a metal ring that is bolted to M. If the mass of the ring is negligible then you just use M as the mass being accelerated by the force. If, on the other hand, you're told that the metal ring has mass m and cannot be ignored, then you'd take M+m as the mass being accelerated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K