Focal length of thin converging lens

  • Thread starter Kompewt
  • Start date
  • #1
3
0

Homework Statement



An outdoor security camera has a simple lens with focal object length fo = 6.00 cm and perfectly focuses the image of a bird onto its detector located 9.00 cm away from the lens. The animal then flies away from the lens and the new focal distance is 8.00 cm. (a) How far did the bird move? (b) What is the new magnification?

Homework Equations


$\begin{array}{l}
\[\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{s} + \frac{1}{{s'}}\]
\end{array}$

The Attempt at a Solution



This is my solution:
$\begin{array}{l}
\frac{1}{{{f_0}}} = \frac{1}{s} + \frac{1}{{s'}}\\
\frac{1}{{{s_1}}} = \frac{1}{{{f}}} - \frac{1}{{s'}} = \frac{1}{6} - \frac{1}{9} = \frac{1}{{18}}\\
{s_1} = 18cm\\
\frac{1}{{{s_2}}} = \frac{1}{{{f}}} - \frac{1}{{s'}} = \frac{1}{6} - \frac{1}{8} = \frac{1}{{24}}\\
{s_2} = 24cm\\
\Delta {s_o} = {s_2} - {s_1} = 24cm - 18cm = 6cm
\end{array}$
As my textbook offers limited worked solutions for this topic I have looked around and it seems that the focal length does not change on a 'simple lens', even if it is bi-convex. It is s and s prime that changes. Or am I misunderstanding the initial question? The wording is somewhat vague.

This is the solution I was presented with:

f1= 6.00 cm

s’1 = s’2= 9 cm ( f > s’ >2f ) + image is real, inverted, and reduced (for both)

f2 = 8.00 cm

s1 = ?

s2 = ?

Ds0= s2- s1

A camera should mean a bi-convex lens.
$\begin{array}{l}
\frac{1}{{{f_0}}} = \frac{1}{s} + \frac{1}{{s'}}\\
\frac{1}{{{s_1}}} = \frac{1}{{{f_1}}} - \frac{1}{{s'}} = \frac{1}{6} - \frac{1}{9} = \frac{1}{{18}}\\
{s_1} = 18cm\\
\frac{1}{{{s_2}}} = \frac{1}{{{f_2}}} - \frac{1}{{s'}} = \frac{1}{8} - \frac{1}{9} = \frac{1}{{72}}\\
{s_2} = 72cm\\
\Delta {s_o} = {s_2} - {s_1} = 72cm - 18cm = 54cm
\end{array}$
The bird flew 54 cm or just over half a metre from the camera.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
35,651
12,217
For s2, I think the 8 centimeters are supposed to change to 9 cm (so the distance between detector and lens changes). The lens itself does not change.

Focal length and focal distance are different things.
 
  • #3
3
0
Thanks for the reply mfb.

I think I am also confusing focal length and focal point, but the solution I was given still doesn't make sense to me. If the image remains focused on the detector then the lens must change or the detector-lens distance must change. If the detector-lens distance changes then it would be from 9cm to 8cm because the object distance has definitely changed in the wording of the question.
 
  • #4
rude man
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
7,945
827

Homework Statement


bea

As my textbook offers limited worked solutions for this topic I have looked around and it seems that the focal length does not change on a 'simple lens', even if it is bi-convex.
Well, you have a good point. A 'simple lens' could not change its focal length.
However, in this problem it must, in order to keep a sharp image for different object distances s1 and s2.
So your 'simple' lens has to be a 'zoom' lens. And I think the problem statement is wrong to call it a 'simple lens'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoom_lens
 

Related Threads on Focal length of thin converging lens

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Top