For a monoid, if uv = 1, do we know vu = 1?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uv
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the context of monoids, if uv = 1 for elements u and v in a monoid M, it does not necessarily imply that vu = 1. The discussion highlights the failure to find a counterexample using 2x2 matrices, as the invertible matrices form a group where each element has a unique inverse. The canonical examples provided involve left and right shifts of sequences or countable dimensional vector spaces, illustrating that LR = id while RL ≠ id.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of monoid structures and properties
  • Familiarity with matrix algebra, specifically 2x2 matrices
  • Knowledge of group theory and invertible elements
  • Concepts of left and right shifts in sequences or vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monoids and their implications in algebra
  • Explore group theory, focusing on the characteristics of invertible matrices
  • Investigate left and right shift operations in vector spaces
  • Examine counterexamples in abstract algebra to deepen understanding of non-commutative operations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone interested in abstract algebra concepts, particularly those studying monoids and group theory.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
If M is a monoid and u,v\in M, and uv = 1, do we know vu = 1? Can someone prove this or provide a counterexample? I tried to come up with one (a counterexample, that is) using 2 x 2 matrices but was unsuccessful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume:
uv=1
If there exists a w such that:
vw=1
Then by associativity:
w=1w=(uv)w=u(vw)=u1=u
Thus if such a w exists it must be u.

This isn't quite enough but I can't find a short proof either. I'll think on it.
 
The canonical example is left and right shift of a sequence or countable dimensional vector space.

L(a,b,c,d,...) = (b,c,d,...)

R(a,b,c,..)=(0,a,b,c...)

LR=id, and RL=/=id.

You won't find one in 2x2 matrices - the invertible ones form a group, so there's no point looking.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K