For gear teeth to linear shaft, what's the center point?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the alignment of gear teeth with a linear shaft in 3D printing applications. It emphasizes that the spacing for gear teeth should be based on the pitch circle, also known as the Pitch Diameter or Pitch Line, rather than solely on the inside or outside of the teeth. The user mentions using an average diameter between the inner and outer teeth for alignment, specifically referencing a 3.5mm tooth design with a 1.75mm addendum and dedendum. This approach ensures proper meshing and functionality in mechanical designs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gear terminology, including Pitch Diameter and Pitch Line
  • Basic knowledge of 3D printing mechanics and design
  • Familiarity with gear tooth geometry, including addendum and dedendum
  • Experience with CAD software for gear design and simulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gear tooth design and spacing
  • Learn about CAD tools for simulating gear interactions
  • Explore the concept of Pitch Circle Diameter in gear systems
  • Investigate best practices for beveling gear teeth for optimal fit
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mechanical engineers, 3D printing enthusiasts, and designers involved in creating gear systems and understanding gear tooth alignment.

shintashi
Messages
117
Reaction score
1
I used to know this back when i worked with Flash animation, but I'm working on a 3D printer now and I've forgotten, when you have a set of teeth, on a linear shaft and a gear,

do you base the unrolling of the gear, for the spacing, on the inside of the teeth, the outside of the teeth, or the halfway point between the two?

Like if i have a shaft with 1x1x1 teeth, of Pi length (like 3.14 inches tall)
do I line up the inside of the gear teeth holes, or the outside of the gear teeth, or something in between?

I know i have to bevel the teeth in either case to fit.

I could have sworn I used the average diameter between the teeth inside and outside, but is that how it works in physical reality? It always looked good in simulations.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yeah agreed, when i was doing a 3.5mm tooth, i ended up using 1.75 addendum, 1.75 dedendum, and the radius (the circle between) was somewhere in the two, but larger by 1.75mm i think (I played around with it for a while). This was a design for a mini drill press. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K