MHB For which parameter values the function is continuous and differentiable

Click For Summary
The function defined piecewise is continuous and differentiable at x=2 if the conditions 4a + 2b + c = 5 and 4a + b = 3 are satisfied. From these equations, it can be derived that b = 2 - c and a = (c + 1)/4. By selecting a specific value for c, such as c = 2, the corresponding values for a and b can be calculated, yielding a = 3/4 and b = 0. This demonstrates that there are infinitely many solutions for the parameters a, b, and c that maintain continuity and differentiability at the specified point. The key takeaway is that the values of a, b, and c are interdependent and can be adjusted while still satisfying the required conditions.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
For which values of a,b and c, the next function is continuous and differentiable at x=2 ?

\left\{\begin{matrix} 3x-1 & x\leq 2\\ ax^{2}+bx+c & x>2 \end{matrix}\right.

1. b=2-c
2. b=6+2c+2a
3. 7+c-2a
4. b=3-a-(3/4)c

I know that f(2)=5, and so is the limit of f when x goes to 2 from the left side.
I have calculated the limit when f goes to 2 from the right side, and I got:

4a+2b+c

and so for continuously I need:

4a+2b+c = 5

but here I got stuck...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only point you need to look at is $x = 2$, as all the others must be continuous and differentiable (remember all polynomials are well-behaved).

Recall that for a function to be continuous at $a$, you need:

$$\lim_{x \to a^{-}} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a^{+}} f(x)$$

So in your case, you need to show that the following is true:

$$\lim_{x \to 2^{-}} 3x - 1 = \lim_{x \to 2^{+}} ax^2 + bx + c ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow ~ ~ ~ 5 = 4a + 2b + c$$

Which is what you got, so this is correct. But, you also need differentiability.

Recall that for a function $f(x)$ to be differentiable at $a$, you need:

$$\lim_{x \to a^{-}} f'(x) = \lim_{x \to a^{+}} f'(x)$$

So, differentiate both pieces of the function, and show that the following is true:

$$\lim_{x \to 2^{-}} 3 = \lim_{x \to 2^{+}} 2ax + b ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow ~ ~ ~ 3 = 4a + b$$

You are now left with two equations in three unknowns:

$$4a + 2b + c = 5$$

$$4a + b = 3$$

Subtract the second from the first, to obtain:

$$b + c = 2 ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow b = 2 - c$$

And substitute this back into the second:

$$4a + 2 - c = 3 ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow ~ ~ ~ a = \frac{1}{4} \left ( c + 1 \right )$$

This gives you $a$ and $b$ in terms of $c$. Choose any $c$, for instance $c = 2$, and you get:

$$a = \frac{3}{4} ~ ~ ~ \text{and} ~ ~ ~ b = 0$$

That is one solution, out of infinitely many. This is also the only class of solutions.
 
Last edited:
Yankel said:
For which values of a,b and c, the next function is continuous and differentiable at x=2 ?

\left\{\begin{matrix} 3x-1 & x\leq 2\\ ax^{2}+bx+c & x>2 \end{matrix}\right.

1. b=2-c
2. b=6+2c+2a
3. 7+c-2a
4. b=3-a-(3/4)c

I know that f(2)=5, and so is the limit of f when x goes to 2 from the left side.
I have calculated the limit when f goes to 2 from the right side, and I got:

4a+2b+c

and so for continuously I need:

4a+2b+c = 5

but here I got stuck...

You have to impose first that $\displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow 2 +} f(x) = \lim_{x \rightarrow 2 -} f(x)$ and after that $\displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow 2 +} f ^{\ '} (x) = \lim_{x \rightarrow 2 -} f^{\ '}(x)$... Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Bacterius said:
The only point you need to look at is $x = 2$, as all the others must be continuous and differentiable (remember all polynomials are well-behaved).

Recall that for a function to be continuous at $a$, you need:

$$\lim_{x \to a^{-}} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a^{+}} f(x)$$

So in your case, you need to show that the following is true:

$$\lim_{x \to 2^{-}} 3x - 1 = \lim_{x \to 2^{+}} ax^2 + bx + c ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow ~ ~ ~ 5 = 4a + 2b + c$$

Which is what you got, so this is correct. But, you also need differentiability.

Recall that for a function $f(x)$ to be differentiable at $a$, you need:

$$\lim_{x \to a^{-}} f'(x) = \lim_{x \to a^{+}} f'(x)$$
This is true, but not an obvious statement. It looks like the definition of "continuous" but derivatives are NOT necessarily contuinuous. What is true is that any derivative, even if not continuous, satisfies the "intermediate value theorem".

So, differentiate both pieces of the function, and show that the following is true:

$$\lim_{x \to 2^{-}} 3 = \lim_{x \to 2^{+}} 2ax + b ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow ~ ~ ~ 3 = 4a + b$$

You are now left with two equations in three unknowns:

$$4a + 2b + c = 5$$

$$4a + b = 3$$

Subtract the second from the first, to obtain:

$$b + c = 2 ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow b = 2 - c$$

And substitute this back into the second:

$$4a + 2 - c = 3 ~ ~ ~ \Longleftrightarrow ~ ~ ~ a = \frac{1}{4} \left ( c + 1 \right )$$

This gives you $a$ and $b$ in terms of $c$. Choose any $c$, for instance $c = 2$, and you get:

$$a = \frac{3}{4} ~ ~ ~ \text{and} ~ ~ ~ b = 0$$

That is one solution, out of infinitely many. This is also the only class of solutions.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K