Force on a point charge due to a sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force exerted by an insulated conducting sphere of radius R, carrying a total charge Q, on a point charge q of the same sign, under the condition that q is much smaller than Q. The electric field due to the point charge is defined by the equation E_pt = q/(4πε₀r²). The potential of the sphere is derived using Legendre solutions to Laplace's equation, leading to the expression Φ(r) = A₀(1 - R/r). The participants debate the appropriateness of using the image method versus an infinite series approach for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, specifically the behavior of point charges and conducting spheres.
  • Familiarity with Laplace's equation and Legendre polynomials.
  • Knowledge of electric field and potential calculations in electrostatics.
  • Experience with boundary conditions in electrostatic problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the image charge method for solving electrostatic problems involving conductors.
  • Review the derivation of electric fields from point charges and their influence on nearby conductors.
  • Explore advanced applications of Legendre polynomials in electrostatics.
  • Investigate the implications of charge distribution on the potential of conducting spheres.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electrostatics, as well as engineers working with electrical systems involving point charges and conductors.

andre220
Messages
75
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


An insulated conducting sphere of radius ##R##, carrying a total charge of ##Q##, is in the field of a point charge ##q## of the same sign. Assume ##q\ll Q##. Calculate and plot the force exerted by the sphere on ##q## as a function of distance from the center. In particular, for ##q/Q = 0.1##, calculate the point at which the direction of force reverses.

Homework Equations


The electric field due a point charge $$E_\mathrm{pt} = \frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2}$$
$$\Phi(r,\theta) = \sum\limits_{l=0}^\infty \left(A_l r^l + \frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}}\right) P_l\left(\cos{\theta}\right)$$
$$\vec{E} = -\vec{\nabla}\Phi$$

The Attempt at a Solution


So since the solution is wanted as a function of distance from the center of the sphere, I am using the legendre solutions to laplace's equation. The boundary conditions are ##\Phi(R,\theta) = 0## and ##E_\mathrm{in} -E_\mathrm{out} = -\sigma/\epsilon_0 \implies E_\mathrm{point} - \nabla_r \Phi =-\frac{4\pi R^2}{\epsilon_0}##
Then once the boundary conditions are satisfied then the force is just ##F = qE_\mathrm{sphere}##.

So for the potential of the sphere:
$$\Phi(r) = A_0 + \frac{B_0}{r}$$
$$\Phi(R) = 0 = A_0 + \frac{B_0}{R}\implies B_0 = -A_0 R\implies \Phi(r) = A_0\left(1-\frac{R}{r}\right)$$
$$E_\mathrm{sphere} = -\frac{2 A_0 R}{r^2}$$
Then, applying the boundary conditions at the surface of the sphere:
$$\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^2} + \frac{2 A_0}{R} = -\frac{4\pi R^2 Q}{\epsilon_0}\implies A_0 = \frac{-q + 16\pi^2 R^4 Q}{8\pi\epsilon_0 R}$$

Then,
$$E_\mathrm{sphere} = \frac{1}{r^2}\left(\frac{q + 16\pi^2 Q R^4}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\right)$$
Then from here I would just do force by multiplying by ##q## of the point charge and then find the point at which the force reverses.

a lot to take in, but does this seem correct thus far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andre220 said:
So for the potential of the sphere:
$$\Phi(r) = A_0 + \frac{B_0}{r}$$
Where does that come from? I think the idea of the conducting sphere is the non-uniform charge distribution. The electric field and therefore the potential should depend on θ.
 
Right, then I don't see how I can get the constants ##A_1, B_1## with only two boundary conditions.
Thats why I only chose to keep ##l = 0## terms.
 
There are formulas how a charge q at some distance L will influence charges on a conducting sphere. It's possible to derive them but I guess that is not necessary here.
Q does not matter for this induced charge.
 
Is this method correct that I am using? Or should I use an image method here?
 
Your method is not incorrect, but it involves an infinite series. I would try the image method first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
665
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K