Fractal Dimension & Degree of Freedom

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Fractal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between fractal dimensions and degrees of freedom, particularly in the context of thermodynamics. It highlights that while traditional dimensions are integral, fractals can exhibit fractional dimensions, as exemplified by the Koch snowflake, which has a dimension of approximately 1.26. The conversation references the paper "Effective degrees of freedom of a random walk on a fractal" by Alexander S. Balankin and the book "Scale Relativity and Fractal Space-Time" by Laurent Nottale, suggesting a potential link between fractal structures and fractional degrees of freedom in specific phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fractal geometry, specifically the concept of self-similarity.
  • Familiarity with the Koch snowflake and its properties.
  • Basic knowledge of degrees of freedom in mathematical contexts.
  • Awareness of non-standard regression techniques and their implications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Effective degrees of freedom of a random walk on a fractal" by Alexander S. Balankin.
  • Explore "Scale Relativity and Fractal Space-Time" by Laurent Nottale for deeper insights into fractal implications.
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of the Koch snowflake and its dimensional analysis.
  • Study the concept of fractional dimensions in various mathematical and physical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers interested in fractal geometry, thermodynamics, and the implications of fractional dimensions in complex systems.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
783
I have been learning about the idea of "dimension" of a shape in terms of how its "mass" scales down when we cut it into self-similar parts.

For example,

However, the term "dimension" is closely linked with the idea of degree of freedom. So my question is, is there any sense in which the dimension of a fractal is linked with a "fractional" degree of freedom? Perhaps leading to some implications of a thermodynamic nature?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The word fractal is, in fact, a short form of fractional dimension.

Simplistically, if I understand it correctly, if your 1-dimensional line is complex enough, you can ultimately reach virtually any point in the 2-dimensional plane. The degree to which you can do this is the fractional component.
i.e. if you can reach m points in the 2-dimensional plane, you have a 1-point-n dimensional structure.

Dunno about thermodynamic implications.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Swamp Thing
Swamp Thing said:
However, the term "dimension" is closely linked with the idea of degree of freedom. So my question is, is there any sense in which the dimension of a fractal is linked with a "fractional" degree of freedom?
As far as I know, there is no connection between fractional dimension and degrees of freedom.
 
Mark44 said:
As far as I know, there is no connection between fractional dimension and degrees of freedom.
? Then I must be mistaken.
AFAIK, something is 1D if you have one degree of freedom (such as a line).
If that line is sufficiently curved, you can achieve an amount of freedom greater than one but less than two.
 
DaveC426913 said:
? Then I must be mistaken.
AFAIK, something is 1D if you have one degree of freedom (such as a line).
If that line is sufficiently curved, you can achieve an amount of freedom greater than one but less than two.
Normally "degrees of freedom" are integral values, but in non-standard regression (which is something new to me), non-integer values are permitted. I haven't read of the term "degrees of freedom" used in discussions of fractals, though, but I haven't done any recent reading about fractals, so maybe someone has made the connection.

The usual meaning of the term fractal is that a curve or surface is self-similar, meaning that it looks the same even when magnified over and over. The usual method of measuring curves assumes that for small enough intervals, the curve is approximately a straight line segment, so we can add up all the pieces to get the overall length of the curve. On the other hand a curve such as the Koch snowflake has little jaggies at all resolutions, so no matter how much we magnify the image, we can find any straight line segments. Mathematically, this curve is nowhere differentiable. Although the area of the Koch snowflake is 1.6 times as large as the triangle it is based on, the perimeter of the Koch snowflake grows large without bound (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_snowflake). Normal geometric curves have a defined perimeter, so because the perimeter of this figure becomes infinite, but encompasses a finite area, it is considered to have a dimension somewhere between 1 and 2 (about 1.26 according to the wiki article).
 
Swamp Thing said:
I have been learning about the idea of "dimension" of a shape in terms of how its "mass" scales down when we cut it into self-similar parts.

For example,

However, the term "dimension" is closely linked with the idea of degree of freedom. So my question is, is there any sense in which the dimension of a fractal is linked with a "fractional" degree of freedom? Perhaps leading to some implications of a thermodynamic nature?


I think that the conection exists, look at this paper : "Effective degrees of freedom of a random walk on a fractal" (Alexander S. Balankin), if in the studied phenomena, space-time structure could be treated as fractal certain phenomena developed in it could respond with fractional degrees of freedom when looking at it in an adecuate scale range

There is an very interesting book from Laurent Nottale : Scale Relativity and Fractal Space-Time, about these kind of problems
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Swamp Thing

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K