MHB Fraction multiplication problem

AI Thread Summary
To multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two, the correct method is to express it as $2 \left(\frac{3}{7}\right) = \frac{2 \cdot 3}{1 \cdot 7} = \frac{6}{7}$. The initial methods discussed, including $2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ and $\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$, are incorrect because they misrepresent the multiplication process. Method 2 incorrectly multiplies by 1, while method 1 unnecessarily alters the denominator. The key takeaway is that when multiplying a fraction by an integer, only the numerator should be multiplied, resulting in $\frac{6}{7}$.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
This problem is a little elementary,

If we were to multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two which way should I be using,

$2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 1

or

$\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 2

I usually multiply fractions using the method in 1 But looks like It is wrong,

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect

I have been used to multiply fractions using the method in 1, So which one of them are correct to multiply $\frac{3}{7}$ by two
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
This problem is a little elementary,

If we were to multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two which way should I be using,

$2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 1

or

$\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 2

I usually multiply fractions using the method in 1 But looks like It is wrong,

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect

I have been used to multiply fractions using the method in 1, So which one of them are correct to multiply $\frac{3}{7}$ by two

Number 2 is wrong because since you have $\dfrac{2}{2}$ you are multiplying by 1 instead of by 2.

Number 1 is also incorrect, what you're doing below when trying it out is to multiply top and bottom by 2 which is the same method as the incorrect "equation" 2 - you're going from 7 to 14 in the denominator for no reason

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect



What you should be doing is:

$2 \left(\dfrac{3}{7}\right) = \dfrac{2}{1} \cdot \dfrac{3}{7} = \dfrac{2 \cdot 3}{1 \cdot 7} = \dfrac{6}{7}$

edit: if you have an integer (or something not written in fractional form - for example $e$ or $\pi$) you multiply only by the numerator
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top