MHB Fraction multiplication problem

mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
This problem is a little elementary,

If we were to multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two which way should I be using,

$2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 1

or

$\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 2

I usually multiply fractions using the method in 1 But looks like It is wrong,

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect

I have been used to multiply fractions using the method in 1, So which one of them are correct to multiply $\frac{3}{7}$ by two
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
This problem is a little elementary,

If we were to multiply the fraction $\frac{3}{7}$ by two which way should I be using,

$2\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 1

or

$\frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ --------------- 2

I usually multiply fractions using the method in 1 But looks like It is wrong,

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect

I have been used to multiply fractions using the method in 1, So which one of them are correct to multiply $\frac{3}{7}$ by two

Number 2 is wrong because since you have $\dfrac{2}{2}$ you are multiplying by 1 instead of by 2.

Number 1 is also incorrect, what you're doing below when trying it out is to multiply top and bottom by 2 which is the same method as the incorrect "equation" 2 - you're going from 7 to 14 in the denominator for no reason

$\frac{2}{1}\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)=\frac{6}{14}$ which is incorrect



What you should be doing is:

$2 \left(\dfrac{3}{7}\right) = \dfrac{2}{1} \cdot \dfrac{3}{7} = \dfrac{2 \cdot 3}{1 \cdot 7} = \dfrac{6}{7}$

edit: if you have an integer (or something not written in fractional form - for example $e$ or $\pi$) you multiply only by the numerator
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top