Fractional Flow Reserve and the physics behind it

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the application of the Laws of Ohm, Poiseuille, and Bernoulli's in understanding the use of pressure wires to study coronary blood flow through lesions in coronary arteries. Participants explore the physics underlying these concepts, with a focus on the implications for clinical practice in cardiology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) expresses a desire to understand the physics behind pressure wire usage in coronary blood flow assessment, acknowledging their assumptions and seeking corrections.
  • The OP mentions their background as a Clinical Cardiac Physiologist and their intent to present their findings to colleagues.
  • One participant offers to review the OP's paper and suggests discussing specific sections, indicating a willingness to assist with the content.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of including proper references and annotations for technical statements in the OP's paper.
  • The OP indicates that their main reference source has been Physics Forums, compiling information from various discussions to form a cohesive understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for proper references and the importance of clarifying technical statements, but there is no consensus on the best way to structure the OP's paper or the specific physics concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

The OP's paper is lengthy, and there are unresolved questions regarding the physics principles and their application. The discussion is ongoing, with plans to post focused questions in a new thread.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for clinical professionals in cardiology, students studying cardiovascular physiology, and individuals interested in the application of physics in medical technology.

JuW
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Have been referring to this forum a lot and I think I finally understand it. However I couldn't find a discussion specific to applying the Laws of Ohm, Poiseuille and Bernoulli's to why we use a pressure wire to study coronary blood flow through a lesion site in the coronary artery. So I made some assumptions on what I think is correct and of course assumptions is a terrible thing to do.

So I wrote it all down. It is 6 pages long. I really, really need someone to read it and help me correct my mistakes. I work in a Hospital and am a Clinical Cardiac Physiologist.

I realize 6 pages is a lot to ask someone to read. It is not homework or an assignment that I am doing. It is personal reflection. I use the equipment. I understand what the numbers mean and how to interpret it to the patient on the table but I don't understand the physics behind it. So I thought it was time I did.

My plan is to finish my write up about the physics side then present it to my other colleagues in the Hospital.

It is written on google docs. I tried to think of a way to condense it so I can add to this forum for discussion but it isn't straight forward when you add all the laws in. The complete picture needed 6 pages to let the words flow as naturally as possible.

So kinda stumped as how to get help. Should I just pasted the whole 6 pages here or do them in chunks or do something else? Anyone's thoughts on what to do would be welcome?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

I will send you a message with my e-mail address, and you can send me a PDF copy to look over. From that we can figure out the best way to proceed. At the very least, we should be able to discuss portions of your paper, especially any sections where you have questions. Is there a bibliography listing the information sources that you used in writing up the paper?
 
Bibliography? Yes and no. My main reference is 'PhysicsForum'! Been reading everything I could from here. All bits and pieces that I tried to add together to gain the overall picture.
 
Well, for a proper paper (and especially one you want to present), you should find applicable references and annotate any technical statements you are making in the paper. Even the articles that I read in JEMS or EMS World have references for authoritative statements that are made in the articles...

https://emsworld.epubxp.com/i/1016822-sep-2018/26?

upload_2018-8-31_13-45-23.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-31_13-45-23.png
    upload_2018-8-31_13-45-23.png
    119.2 KB · Views: 573
Apologies to all for the delay. The OP and I are working on gathering valid references for his paper, and we will try to post focused questions in a new thread soon. This thread here is closed for now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K