Frank-Condon Principle - Potential Energy Surfaces

elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
Theory and my Understanding:

So I understand how the frank condon principle let's us effect electronic transitions instantaneously, since the motion of nuclei (on the timescale of such electronic transitions) is quite slow.

Consequently, when a photon of light is absorbed you can have an electron being promoted from the Sx0 to the Sy1 where S represents the singlet state and x and y are vibrational levels (x>y)

My Question

What effects how much the upper curve is translated over to the right-hand-side, with respect, to the lower curve ?

My Interpretation

When an electron is promoted from S00 to S21, for example, the electron is being put into an anti-bonding orbital consequently weakening bonds and leading to a greater vibrations.

The more anti-bonding character the S1 state has the greater the amount by which the upper curve is translated over to the right-hand-side and hence the larger the vibrations.

9XrmEfW.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your explanation sounds good.
 
DrDu said:
Yes, your explanation sounds good.

Thanks! I just have one last question, if you imagine a porphyrin ring versus simple benzene. It is my belief that the upper curve (see above diagram) is displaced more to the right in benzene.

This is because a single electronic excitation in a massive porphyrin ring (a multi electron system) is unlikely to change the bonding character of the molecule by that much.
 
Yes, but it depends on the localization of the orbitals that are involved.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top