Free Fall Trajectory? Simple answer

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of free fall trajectory in the context of a marble rolling down a ramp and subsequently falling off a table. The original poster seeks clarification on the method to recalculate the horizontal velocity of the marble at the bottom of the track, given specific measurements related to height and distance traveled.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the free fall trajectory method and its relation to vector components. They inquire about the necessity of the ramp's angle and seek guidance on the calculations involved.
  • Some participants suggest calculating the time of fall based on the height of the table and relate it to the horizontal distance traveled.
  • Others question the accuracy of the original calculations and explore the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing insights into the calculations and relationships between variables. Some guidance has been offered regarding the time of fall and the equations involved, but there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of all calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some confusion regarding the height measurements and the relationship between potential and kinetic energy. The original poster also expresses uncertainty about the need for additional information, such as the length of the track.

MacFanBoy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Free Fall Trajectory

So I am basically lost in what that means. I think it is the component method for vectors? Am I right? Some background on the lab: We rolled a marble down a curved ramp so that it went off the table and hit the ground in front of the table. (we marked where it hit with carbon copy paper. I already measured the potential energy and velocity.

Homework Statement


Question: Recalculate the horizontal marble velocity of the marble at the bottom of the track using the free fall trajectory method.

The height of the curved track from the table was 14.3cm and the height from the table to the ground was 84.4cm
And the distance that the marble traveled from the edge of the desk was 44.5cm
mass of marble = 13.7g

Do I need the length of the track?

Homework Equations


(THis is what I am looking for)


The Attempt at a Solution


If someone could explain what free fall trajectory method is (my teacher doesn't teach, he just talks). That should be enough to point me in the right direction. Also if it is the component method, then i would need the angle of the ramp, correct?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You basically have it, so long as you know the height of the table.

Knowing the height you can calculate the time that it takes to drop.

Your Vy is initially zero until it goes off the edge.

So the time is given simply by 1/*g*t2 = height of table.

Knowing the time you're rolling in clover because the x distance isd calculated simply by Vx * time.

Not asked but going further if you know the V you know the m*v2/2 which is going to be equal (if you could ignore friction and such) to the initial Potential energy of the marble at the height it started rolling down from.
 
Ok, so when I do:
height of table = 84.4cm

.844m=[.5*(9.80m/s)]*t2

I get t=.415s

Then; dx=Vx*t gets me Vx of 1.07m/s

Thats the velocity in the X-direction?



If so then my other calculations are off by 400%...

This is what I got for my other calcs:
mmarble=13.7g
htable and ramp = 98.7cm

PE=mgh
PE=(.0137kg)(9.80m/s)(.987m) =.133 J

Then;
PE=KE
.133 J=.5*m*v^2
.133 J= .5*(.0137kg)*v^2
v=4.41 m/s

Is all of that right?

Thanks
 
MacFanBoy said:
Ok, so when I do:
height of table = 84.4cm

.844m=[.5*(9.80m/s)]*t2

I get t=.415s

Then; dx=Vx*t gets me Vx of 1.07m/s

Thats the velocity in the X-direction?



If so then my other calculations are off by 400%...

This is what I got for my other calcs:
mmarble=13.7g
htable and ramp = 98.7cm

PE=mgh
PE=(.0137kg)(9.80m/s)(.987m) =.133 J

Then;
PE=KE
.133 J=.5*m*v^2
.133 J= .5*(.0137kg)*v^2
v=4.41 m/s

Is all of that right?

Thanks

Not quite. If

1/2*m*v2 = m*g*h

Then your initial Vx will be given by Vx = (2*g*h)1/2

The h though is only the h of the ramp down to the top of the table.

That comes to (2*9.8*.143)1/2
 
Oh. Alrighty. I guess it just clicked in my head. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
40
Views
3K