 #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
 1,016
 44
Main Question or Discussion Point
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book "Rings and Their Modules ...
Currently I am focused on Section 2.2 Free Modules ... ...
I need some help in order to fully understand the proof of the equivalence of (1) and (3) in Proposition 2.2.3 ...
Proposition 2.2.3 and its proof reads as follows:
Bland omits the proof of the equivalence of (1) and (3) ...
Can someone please help me to get started on a rigorous proof of the equivalence of (1) and (3) ... especially covering the case where [itex]\Delta[/itex] is an unaccountably infinite set ...
Peter
Currently I am focused on Section 2.2 Free Modules ... ...
I need some help in order to fully understand the proof of the equivalence of (1) and (3) in Proposition 2.2.3 ...
Proposition 2.2.3 and its proof reads as follows:
Bland omits the proof of the equivalence of (1) and (3) ...
Can someone please help me to get started on a rigorous proof of the equivalence of (1) and (3) ... especially covering the case where [itex]\Delta[/itex] is an unaccountably infinite set ...
Peter
Attachments

142.7 KB Views: 641