The forum discussion centers on the implications of "free speech zones" established during the Bush administration, particularly highlighted by the arrest of Brett Bursey for holding an anti-war sign at a presidential event. Participants debate the nature of free speech, with some asserting it must be absolute, while others acknowledge necessary restrictions for public safety. The conversation also critiques the media's role in covering dissent and questions the legitimacy of governmental authority in regulating speech. The discussion emphasizes the tension between political speech and governmental control, referencing the First Amendment as a foundational principle.
PREREQUISITESPolitical activists, legal scholars, journalists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of free speech and governmental authority in democratic societies.
Nevertheless, there is a difference between havng a special area sectioned off, and putting that section so far away as to render the free speech of the protesters almost meaningless. Bush is pushing the limits of the law(can't say for sure he is breaking the law) for political, not safety reasons.
Well, maybe you should have a 'knee jerk' reaction against other people, either...especially since THIS post of your, after you calmed down a bit, seems a lot more reasonable than where you started, huh?
Actually, I have been calm since the beginning, and you are assuming a knee jerk reaction. My actions thus far on this board have been fully thought through :) If you feel I need pruning, banning, or anything else, you are more than welcome to do so. I enjoy ruffling your's and Adam's feathers, but you pointed yourselves out for the doing
