FTL via entanglement- paper discussing similar

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of faster-than-light (FTL) communication or travel, specifically in relation to a paper that explores ideas related to entanglement. Participants are seeking insights and comments on the feasibility of FTL based on the paper's content.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a paper that discusses concepts related to FTL and invites comments on its implications.
  • Another participant questions the publication status of the paper and expresses uncertainty about adhering to forum guidelines.
  • A suggestion is made for the original poster to summarize their understanding of the paper's ideas and pose questions regarding the possibility of FTL.
  • A participant references their own posts in a different thread that may relate to the discussion on FTL.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not appear to reach a consensus, as participants express uncertainty and seek clarification on the paper and the concept of FTL.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the publication status of the referenced paper, and participants are navigating forum guidelines while discussing potentially speculative ideas.

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
I just found a paper which was thinking along similar lines:

http://casimirinstitute.net/coherence/Jensen.pdf

Any comments on why FTL is not possible (after browsing the paper)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
San K said:
I just found a paper which was thinking along similar lines:

http://casimirinstitute.net/coherence/Jensen.pdf

Any comments on why FTL is not possible (after browsing the paper)?

First: where was that paper published?
- https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380
 
Last edited by a moderator:
harrylin said:
First: where was that paper published?
- https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380

not sure if it was published.

have i inadvertently crossed the guidelines?

in that case I will remove the post and make a new post in my own thoughts and words
 
San K said:
not sure if it was published.

have i inadvertently crossed the guidelines?

in that case I will remove the post and make a new post in my own thoughts and words

I suppose that you may just as well continue this thread by adding a summary of your idea as presented in that paper, and then ask why, based on your thoughts, FTL is not possible. :-p
 
harrylin said:
I suppose that you may just as well continue this thread by adding a summary of your idea as presented in that paper, and then ask why, based on your thoughts, FTL is not possible. :-p

i have posted in the below link...post numbers 9, 10, 11

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=506453
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Superluminal Quantum tunneling without FTL messaging
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Graduate Misunderstanding Eberhard's paper on FTL communication?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Graduate Using GHz multi-particle entanglement for FTL communication
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Graduate How do entanglement experiments benefit from QFT (over QM)?
  • · Replies 473 ·
16
Replies
473
Views
33K
Graduate "Nonclassical Advantage in Metrology" paper
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Graduate Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Graduate Non-locality: (FTL) 'influence' at all?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Graduate Can you determine if a string of particle pairs is composed of entangled pairs?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Entanglement - Does FTL via entanglement violate causality or relativity?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
12K
Graduate Bell-state entanglement swapping and retrocausality
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K