FTL via entanglement- paper discussing similar

[San K]

I just found a paper which was thinking along similar lines:

http://casimirinstitute.net/coherence/Jensen.pdf

Any comments on why FTL is not possible (after browsing the paper)?

 

[harrylin]

I just found a paper which was thinking along similar lines:

http://casimirinstitute.net/coherence/Jensen.pdf

Any comments on why FTL is not possible (after browsing the paper)?

First: where was that paper published?
- https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380

 

[San K]

First: where was that paper published?
- https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=414380

not sure if it was published.

have i inadvertently crossed the guidelines?

in that case I will remove the post and make a new post in my own thoughts and words

 

[harrylin]

not sure if it was published.

have i inadvertently crossed the guidelines?

in that case I will remove the post and make a new post in my own thoughts and words

I suppose that you may just as well continue this thread by adding a summary of your idea as presented in that paper, and then ask why, based on your thoughts, FTL is not possible.

 

[San K]

I suppose that you may just as well continue this thread by adding a summary of your idea as presented in that paper, and then ask why, based on your thoughts, FTL is not possible.

i have posted in the below link...post numbers 9, 10, 11

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=506453