Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Full implications of bell's inequality

  1. Jul 20, 2010 #1
    The violation of Bell's inequality is often said to imply that either there exists non-locality or there are no hidden variables. In actual experiments it is consistenly found that the inequality is violated by precisely the amount predicted by quantum theory. But quantum theory denies both locality and hidden variables. Therefore aren't we to conclude that the violation of Bell's inequality implies that there is both non-locality and no hidden variables?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 20, 2010 #2

    JesseM

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Why do you think it denies them? It doesn't include any hidden variables, for example, but that's not the same as "denying" them. Quantum theory is just a recipe for making predictions about the probabilities of different measurable events, with no built-in interpretation of where these probabilities come from or what they "mean", so there's no reason in principle it couldn't turn out to be an approximation to some more detailed theory. And we know that conventional nonrelativistic QM makes exactly the same predictions as Bohmian mechanics, which does include hidden variables, assigning particles a well-defined position at all times...nothing about the QM formalism rules out the possibility that some other model like Bohmian mechanics could describe the underlying "reality", provided the model makes the same probabilistic predictions as ordinary QM.
     
  4. Jul 20, 2010 #3

    DrChinese

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Could be. I would say that it is highly dependent on your precise definition of non-locality and "no hidden variables". It is generally agreed that with common definitions of each, the answer to your question is NO. But with different definitions - which could also be considered reasonable in some ways - the answer might be YES.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Full implications of bell's inequality
  1. Bell's Inequality (Replies: 5)

  2. Bell inequality (Replies: 1)

  3. Bell inequality (Replies: 11)

  4. Bell's Inequality (Replies: 68)

Loading...