Functional Illiteracy & Math Skills: Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter B May
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of a person being functionally illiterate while possessing strong mathematical skills. It acknowledges that while someone can learn math through verbal or experiential methods without reading, such a scenario is unlikely. Functional illiteracy typically stems from a lack of education rather than a learning disability, distinguishing it from conditions like dyslexia. The conversation suggests that while some individuals may have a natural aptitude for math, effective communication and learning in mathematics generally require literacy. Ultimately, it emphasizes that mathematics is a social activity, necessitating the ability to read and write to share and develop mathematical ideas.
B May
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can a person be functionally illiterate but be highly skilled in math?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can't read text, how can you read symbols?
 
Its of course conceivable... but i doubt there are people who can be described as such.
If you were illiterate you could still be taught mathematics and the symbols involved, i.e. learn verbally, or experimentally etc... but being taught math, or learning it yourself would imply a situation or disposition that would lend itself to learning written language first, and more importantly.
 
Probably not. As far as I know, most reading disorders, such as dyslexia, are quite a bit different from functional illiteracy. Correct me if I'm wrong, but illiteracy is the result of a lack of education, not a learning disability. And if you don't pay attention in school, you're not going to learn any math.
 
But, is it possible that someone could have not had the opportunity to learn to read but possesses a natural ability for comprehending mathematical concepts?
 
I don't see why not. Some people just seem more "wired" for math than others. It's kind of a pointless question though, because math isn't something that's carried out in seclusion in people's minds and then opens a portal to Plato's world of forms. It's a social activity, and you won't learn math or be able to communicate the math you invent without literacy.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K