Fundamental frequency of a standing wave

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
16 replies · 18K views
dlthompson81
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A standing wave is established in a string of length 150 cm fixed at both ends. The string vibrates in four segments when driven at 140 Hz.

Find the wavelength in meters.

Find the fundamental frequency.

Homework Equations



L = Nλ
v = fλ

The Attempt at a Solution



L = Nλ
1.5m = 2λ λ = 0.75m (This answer was correct)


v = fλ
v = 140(0.75) = 105
L = Nλ
1.5m = (1/2)λ λ = 3
v = fλ
105=f3 f = 35 Hz (This was wrong)

Where did I go wrong on this? Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dlthompson81 said:

Homework Statement



A standing wave is established in a string of length 150 cm fixed at both ends. The string vibrates in four segments when driven at 140 Hz.

Find the wavelength in meters.

Find the fundamental frequency.

Homework Equations



L = Nλ
v = fλ

The Attempt at a Solution



L = Nλ
1.5m = 2λ λ = 0.75m (This answer was correct)


v = fλ
v = 140(0.75) = 105
L = Nλ
1.5m = (1/2)λ λ = 3
v = fλ
105=f3 f = 35 Hz (This was wrong)

Where did I go wrong on this? Thanks for the help.

fo should be related to f by the number of nodes
The only other explanation is a f0 of 70hz that is referring to the segments of the standing wave + original wave in counting segments
 
If only one segment is vibrating, then the wavelength is 2 * Length. Since the string is 1.5m long, that would make the wavelength 3m. Right?
 
To get the frequency I need to divide the speed of the wave by the wavelength.

The speed is the frenquency * wavelength.

So v = 140Hz * 3 = 420

Then v = fλ:
420 = f3
f = 140 ?

Is that it?
 
Last edited:
Ok. So I tried that answer. It's not right either. I'm totally lost I guess.
 
The speed is 420.

I'm not sure of what wavelength to use.

3 was the wavelength at 2*L

0.75 was the wavelength for the first part of the problem when there were 4 segments on the string

420/.75 = 560 doesn't sound right, if the wavelength gets longer and speed stays constant, then f should be getting smaller

420/3 was wrong, 3 was the wavelength if there was only one section on the string which i thought was the correct wavelength
 
So, wouldn't it be:

v = f λ

420 = f 3

420/3 = 140

Or, did I mess up on the speed somehow?
 
Yes. But I thought I had it wrong.

I originally had the problem in the original post as this:

105=f3 105/3 f=35

Which was wrong according to my homework program.
 
I found several other example problems that I worked out the same exact way and got those right, but when I worked it out for my homework and entered it in, it was wrong. I don't know where I went wrong.
 
Ok. So the due date was this morning, and I can download the answers now. I'm going to discuss it with my teacher because I don't believe the answer was correct.

The answer was:

f = v/2L = fλ/2L = (140 Hz)(0.75 m) / 2(150 cm) = 0.35 Hz

I'm thinking the m and cm is a mistake. I think it should all be in units of meters or centimeters.
 
dlthompson81 said:
Ok. So the due date was this morning, and I can download the answers now. I'm going to discuss it with my teacher because I don't believe the answer was correct.

The answer was:

f = v/2L = fλ/2L = (140 Hz)(0.75 m) / 2(150 cm) = 0.35 Hz

I'm thinking the m and cm is a mistake. I think it should all be in units of meters or centimeters.

Are you sure the driving frequency wasn't 1.40 Hz, rather than 140 Hz. That would explain it also. 1.40 Hz sounds more reasonable for a string.
 
I talked to the teacher about it. He said it was a mistake in the problem. He gave everyone credit for it.

Thanks for the help with it. I hate I took up your time with an unsolvable problem.