Future Naming Scheme for Planets and Systems in Our Evolving Universe

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the naming conventions for celestial bodies in a speculative future context, including the terminology for star systems, the naming of moons, and philosophical considerations regarding the nature of the universe and potential multiverses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a naming scheme for a solitary multiple star system, questioning the correct term for such a system.
  • Another participant suggests the term "Unary" for a single star system, referencing the unary numeral system.
  • There is a discussion about how pilots might refer to celestial bodies, with one participant suggesting that names like "Earth's moon" or "Phobos" could vary based on context and familiarity.
  • Philosophical questions are raised about the definition of "The Universe" and whether anything exists outside of it, with one participant noting that the universe's size and shape are not definitively known and that discussions about the multiverse exist but lack evidence.
  • Another participant proposes using "Terra" and "Luna" as alternative names for Earth and its moon, respectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the naming conventions and the philosophical implications of the universe's boundaries. There is no consensus on the terminology or the nature of the universe itself, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes speculative elements regarding future naming schemes and philosophical inquiries that are not settled within the current scientific understanding.

Omega_Prime
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I've been passionately researching my latest novel idea as it takes place in an extremely far fetched future with long range interstellar travel and all that and the brink of controlled time modulation etc...

While doing this, I've been able to name every site, system, planet of importance, however I find that an intelligent futuristic society would have some kind of tried and true, advanced naming scheme to reference planets, systems, galaxies etc apart from their relative Universal location as these humans might no longer consider "Earth" home as we do today (no more than my parents consider Africa home, as in Ancestral Eve Africa). For the most part this is done, my problem lies in things like:

1. What is the name for a solitary multiple star system (I hope I'm wording this correctly! - I get the naming scheme from 2 stars on: Binary, Trinary, Quaternary etc... but what is only one star system called?

2. Suppose a freighter was traveling from, say Europa to the Earth's moon. If said freighter's pilot was getting absolutely hammered minutes before preflight at a Europan tavern would he say he was headed to Earth's moon? Whereas another guy might say he's just flying to Phobos. Not having to say Mar's moon, Phobos?

3. Also, how set are we on defining what is "The" Universe? Have there been any discussions on the possibility that things may exist outside of what we perceive as existence? This is perhaps more philosophical than physically scientific though, or is that the realm of the Multiverse..? What I'm curious about is, can we explain the size and shape of the Universe? It appears that the universe we see can be spatially mapped 3 dimensionally right now, but this may change as we come to understand... other dimensions such as time to which we can treat like distances and locations. If such is probable.

I hope this leads to some good discussion, and I appreciate any constructive input, information or areas where I may acquire some more insight. I tried googling for solutions with the above which was rewarding, but I'm still amused with these for the moment.

Thanks for your time or 2 cents!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Omega_Prime said:
3. Also, how set are we on defining what is "The" Universe? Have there been any discussions on the possibility that things may exist outside of what we perceive as existence? This is perhaps more philosophical than physically scientific though, or is that the realm of the Multiverse..? What I'm curious about is, can we explain the size and shape of the Universe? It appears that the universe we see can be spatially mapped 3 dimensionally right now, but this may change as we come to understand... other dimensions such as time to which we can treat like distances and locations. If such is probable.

The size/shape of the universe is not known. It may be infinite or it may be finite but bounded. There are LOTS of discussions of the multiverse and such things but there is exactly zero evidence for any such. The "universe" means all that there is, so there is no such thing as "outside" of the universe.
 
You could use Terra and Luna, if you want some less colloquial names for Earth and its moon, respectively.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K