What Is Galilean Electrodynamics and Its Controversies?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Galilean Electrodynamics is a controversial subject that challenges Einstein's theory of relativity and is often categorized as pseudo-science. The discussion highlights that while the term refers to a journal, it also encompasses a Galilean-invariant formulation of electrodynamics, which has pedagogical and theoretical significance. Notable references include works by Le Bellac & Levy-Leblond and Jammer & Stachel, which explore the implications of such formulations. The topic raises questions about its classification and the claims of racism associated with the theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with electrodynamics and its formulations
  • Knowledge of scientific journal publications
  • Basic grasp of pedagogical methods in physics education
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the journal "Galilean Electrodynamics" and its publications
  • Explore the paper "Galilean Electromagnetism" by Le Bellac & Levy-Leblond
  • Read "If Maxwell had worked between Ampère and Faraday" by Jammer & Stachel
  • Investigate the claims of racism in scientific theories and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, educators in the field of physics, and researchers interested in the historical and theoretical aspects of electrodynamics.

Zarlucicil
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
Galilean Electrodynamics?!?

I finished reading The History of Pi by Petr Beckman, thoroughly enjoyed it and wondered what other works/activities the author was involved with. Soo I eventually came across this thing called "Galilean Electrodynamics" (which Beckman apparently had a hand in starting) and was completely confused as I couldn't really find any real information on it. I know that the subscribers to Galilean Electrodynamics challenge Einstein's Relativity but what else encompasses this subject?!?

The wikipedia article was deleted some time ago and I've seen claims that the theory (if that is what Galilean Electrodynamics is) is somehow racist and completely crass. Is it some kind of pseudo science? Any information would be interesting...Thanks!

-Zarlucicil-
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Zarlucicil said:
Is it some kind of pseudo science?

Yes.
 


Hehe, thanks! But WHY is it considered to be a pseudo science?
 


I don't think the forum would be well served by a detailed discussion of the ins and outs of one particular piece of crackpottery.
 


I just want to point out that the above "Galilean Electrodynamics (Beckman)" is the title of a journal.

This, however, should be distinguished from
a Galilean-invariant formulation of Electrodynamics (i.e. what electrodynamics might have looked like if the world were Galilean invariant [rather than Lorentz-invariant]). While such a formulation doesn't describe the real world, it has pedagogical interest (for the teaching physics) and theoretical interest (for the structure of relativistic theories):
e.g.,
Le Bellac & Levy-Leblond (Nuovo Cimento A, 14 , 217-233 (1973) ) "Galilean Electromagnetism",
Jammer & Stachel (AJP, 1980) "If Maxwell had worked between Ampère and Faraday: An historical fable with a pedagogical moral" http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.12239,
de Montigny & Rousseaux (AJP, 2007) "On some applications of Galilean electrodynamics of moving bodies" http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2772289
(I have an active research interest in this... in particular, with regard to "classical limits")
None of what is in this paragraph should be confused with the journal referred to in the first post of this thread.
 
Last edited:


I would be very interested to know how a theory of electrodynamics could possibly be racist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kparcell

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
503K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K