Game Theory & Life: Neumann, Nash & Beyond

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the potential connections between game theory, as developed by Neumann and Nash, and the behavior of subatomic particles. Participants consider whether principles from evolutionary game theory could elucidate the stability of atomic particles and the implications for understanding human behavior and altruism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that game theory could explain the behavior of subatomic particles and their stability, suggesting a link between evolutionary games and atomic actions.
  • Others argue that not all subatomic particles are stable, highlighting the work of physicists who study particle decay.
  • A participant references Richard Dawkins' "The Selfish Gene" to discuss the idea of purpose in evolution and questions whether game theory can model animal behavior, including human interactions.
  • There is a suggestion that game theory operates on a macro scale, while human behavior may be influenced by lower-level physical laws, seeking a universal link through mathematical notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that not all subatomic particles are stable, but there is no consensus on how game theory relates to particle behavior or human interactions. Multiple competing views remain regarding the applicability of game theory to these domains.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the relationship between game theory and physics, as well as the nature of stability in subatomic particles, which remain unresolved.

ron_jay
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Apart from all the path breaking works by Neumann and Nash on this subject, i was wondering if one could actually use this to explain the behaviour of subatomic particles or vice versa which by all means tend to attain stability.If one can work back from evolution games down to the actions of the atomic particles linked through the genes..we might came across a hint of the structural beauty of this universe!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ron_jay said:
Apart from all the path breaking works by Neumann and Nash on this subject, i was wondering if one could actually use this to explain the behaviour of subatomic particles or vice versa which by all means tend to attain stability...

not all "sub-atomic particles" are stable, and there are a large number of physicists whose job it is to work out the manner in which particles decay.
 
Yes, that's correct that not all sub-atomic particles are stable. Things always follow a particular direction; a line which may be straight or otherwise for a definite purpose as Richard Dawkins in "The Selfish Gene" so explains about the hidden truths in evolution. Which to us humans may seem different but, it always follows along that line of 'purpose' to meet;like a condition, a physics rule. Would it not be possible to derive from the present notations of game theory of how 'animals' will behave which certainly includes humans in the modern paradigm. Altruism certainly benefits humans and all other organisms; one cannot forget the fact that higher order levels in organisation is formed by lower levels and the effect of the lower physical levels control the apparent reality that we perceive. What I mean to say is that Game Theory works on a macro scale, but the behaviour of humans(now specifically) is rooted from the lower sub-atomic laws.The search is for the link that is definitive and universal.How would one use mathematical notations to explain, at first, the theoretical events in human interaction which is nothing but a sum on numerous games being played simultaneously?
 
Locked for lack of Physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K