Gamma electron coupled simulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simulating gamma rays incident on an aluminum disk to produce an electron spectrum, which then generates Cherenkov radiation in a gas medium like CO2. To achieve Cherenkov radiation, the charged particles must exceed the speed of light in that medium, which may be challenging given the energy levels and refractive index of the gas. The user is advised to use the PHYS:e card to enable Cherenkov radiation in MCNP6, specifically referencing version 6.3 of the software. Proper configuration of the simulation parameters is crucial for accurate results, and users should consult the relevant manual for their specific version. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the physics involved in the simulation for successful outcomes.
Salman Khan
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
I am interested to simulate a problem in mcnp6, in which gamma rays (energy let say 10 Mev) incident on a aluminum disk and produce electron spectrum which further move in a gas (e.g co2)cell to produce chernkove radiation. Here gamma produce electron and electron further produce chernekov, in order to see chernkove photon mode p e only works?, or if I will get electron spectrum I will take it as input source and re simulate it to see chernkove light? Please guide thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Salman,

The gas part confuses me a bit. To get Cerenkov (I also thought his name was spelled with an h) radiation the charged particle must travel faster than light through the medium. A trick, for those that don't know, that is possible because the speed of light through a transparent object is c/n where n is the refractive index. Unless the gas is under high pressure, the energy and implied refractive index seem a bit low.

Reading the manual, because I'm not familiar with the versions that transport visible light, mode p e should work but you need a PHYS:e card to turn on Cerenkov. Something like
Code:
PHYS : e 100 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 J 0.917 0.001 0.01
to use low numbers of Cerenkov photons with higher weight as recommended. This is for version 6.3 of the code and you should check the right manual for your version of the code, this command typically changes between versions.

Good luck and please let us know how well this works!
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and Salman Khan
Thanks Alex
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Back
Top