Gamma Function Limits: Proving \Gamma(x) \to 0 as x \to -\infty

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
julypraise
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The absolute value of the gamma function [itex]\Gamma (x)[/itex] that is defined on the negative real axis tends to zero as [itex]x \to - \infty[/itex]. Right? But how do I prove it?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to use Gauss's Formula:

[tex]\Gamma(x)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{n!n^{z}}{z(z+1) \cdots (z+n)}.[/tex]

Should I keep going in this direction?

But frankly, the calculation gets too technical so it'd be better if there is a bit easier way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


julypraise said:

Homework Statement



The absolute value of the gamma function [itex]\Gamma (x)[/itex] that is defined on the negative real axis tends to zero as [itex]x \to - \infty[/itex]. Right? But how do I prove it?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to use Gauss's Formula:

[tex]\Gamma(x)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{n!n^{z}}{z(z+1) \cdots (z+n)}.[/tex]

Should I keep going in this direction?

But frankly, the calculation gets too technical so it'd be better if there is a bit easier way.

Have you ever looked at the graph of the Gamma function on the real line? Look in here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function . Does it look to you that ##\Gamma(x) \rightarrow 0 ## as ##x \rightarrow -\infty?##

RGV
 


Ray Vickson said:
Have you ever looked at the graph of the Gamma function on the real line? Look in here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function . Does it look to you that ##\Gamma(x) \rightarrow 0 ## as ##x \rightarrow -\infty?##

RGV

Ah.. I know what you mean. Maybe I need to modify my problem first. I know it has poles on non-positive integers. But excluding poles, it seems the absolute value of the gamma function tends to zero as [itex]x \to - \infty[/itex].

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Complex_gamma_function_abs.png)

May I define

[itex]f(x) = \Gamma (x)[/itex] only for [itex]x<0 \quad \mbox{and} \quad x \neq -1, -2, -3, -4, \dots[/itex]

and then prove [itex]|f(x)| \to 0[/itex] as [itex]x \to - \infty[/itex]?
 


Ah... MY BAD! sorry.. what was I thinking... Let me clarify once more:

Take [itex]x_{n} \in (-n,1-n)[/itex]. Then [itex]\Gamma (x_{n}) \to 0[/itex] as [itex]n \to \infty[/itex].

I think I have an idea to solve it without using Gauss's Formula. After I try, I will put on the thread.

Anyway thanks for reminding me.