Hi,I'm trying to prove that [tex]\lim_{x\to 0}\Gamma(x) =

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Froskoy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the limit of the Gamma function as \( x \) approaches zero, specifically the claim that \( \lim_{x\to 0}\Gamma(x) = \infty \). Participants explore various mathematical approaches and reasoning to understand and prove this limit, including the use of recurrence relations and integral definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Froskoy, expresses confusion about the limit and the implications of the recurrence relation \( \Gamma(x)=\frac{\Gamma(x+1)}{x} \), questioning how both the numerator and denominator behave as \( x \) approaches zero.
  • Another participant clarifies that the next value, \( \Gamma(1) \), leads to an indeterminate form \( 0 \times \infty \) when applying the limit, suggesting that this complicates the analysis.
  • Another approach is proposed using the definition of the Gamma function as an integral, suggesting the application of the theorem of dominated convergence to interchange the limit and the integral.
  • A participant notes that as \( x \) approaches zero, \( \Gamma(1+x) \) approaches \( \Gamma(1) = 1 \), leading to the conclusion that \( \Gamma(x) \) behaves like \( 1/x \), which tends to infinity.
  • Froskoy later acknowledges that the discussion has clarified the topic and mentions having explored both methods of proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single method of proof but explore multiple approaches and reasoning, indicating that the discussion remains open and exploratory.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the behavior of the Gamma function near zero and the application of limits in the context of recurrence relations and integrals are discussed, but these remain unresolved and subject to further exploration.

Froskoy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to prove that [tex]\lim_{x\to 0}\Gamma(x) = \infty[/tex] but I'm having a little trouble understanding.

Using the recurrence relation [tex]\Gamma(x)=\frac{\Gamma(x+1)}{x}[/tex] you can see that as the denominator tends towards zero, you'd expect the whole thing to get bigger and bigger...
but doesn't that mean that the numerator will get bigger and bigger as well because the next value of [itex]\Gamma(x)[/itex] will be bigger as well so it won't tend to infinity?

So how do you show this formally? Is there some mathematical was of quantifying how quickly the function tends towards infinity?

With many thanks,

Froskoy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Froskoy said:
Hi,

I'm trying to prove that [tex]\lim_{x\to 0}\Gamma(x) = \infty[/tex] but I'm having a little trouble understanding.

Using the recurrence relation [tex]\Gamma(x)=\frac{\Gamma(x+1)}{x}[/tex] you can see that as the denominator tends towards zero, you'd expect the whole thing to get bigger and bigger...
but doesn't that mean that the numerator will get bigger and bigger as well because the next value of [itex]\Gamma(x)[/itex] will be bigger as well so it won't tend to infinity?
No, the next value is [itex]\Gamma(1)=\lim_{x\to 0}x \Gamma(x)[/itex]: using the previous limit would give [itex]0\times\infty[/itex] which is undetermined.
Froskoy said:
So how do you show this formally? Is there some mathematical was of quantifying how quickly the function tends towards infinity?

With many thanks,

Froskoy.

You are on the right track with the recurrence relation: can you find an expression for [itex]\Gamma(1+x)[/itex] when [itex]x\to0[/itex]?
 


I think it's easier using the definition of the Gamma function:

[tex]\lim_{z\rightarrow 0}{ \int_0^{+\infty}{ e^{-t}t^zdt } }[/tex]

Now use the theorem of dominated convergence to interchange limit and integral.
 


x -> 0
Gamma(1+x) -> Gamma(1) = 1
x = Gamma(1+x)/x -> 1/x -> infinity
 


Thanks everyone! It is much clearer now and I have done it both ways.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K