A 5th Dimension May Explain Quantum Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the proposition that a fifth dimension may provide an explanation for quantum theory, as presented in a paper by Tim Anderson Ph.D. Participants explore the implications of this idea, its mathematical foundations, and the relationship between classical and quantum physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants summarize the paper's claim that a fifth dimension could account for quantum behavior, suggesting that quantum mechanics might arise from classical motion in an undetectable dimension.
  • One participant emphasizes the limitations of non-technical summaries in the popular press regarding complex scientific ideas.
  • Another participant encourages reviewing the original study and raises the question of whether the fifth dimension concept is merely a mathematical trick.
  • A participant critiques the notion that quantum physics in 1+3 dimensions can be derived from classical physics in 1+4 dimensions, arguing that the differences between classical and quantum field theories extend beyond the presence of loop Feynman diagrams.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and implications of the fifth dimension concept in relation to quantum theory. There is no consensus on whether the proposed model holds merit or if it is simply a mathematical abstraction.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the discussion hinges on the interpretation of mathematical frameworks and the foundational principles that differentiate classical and quantum theories, which remain unresolved.

Secan
Messages
141
Reaction score
11
At least according to Tim Anderson Ph.D who wrote the paper in Physics Review.

https://news.knowledia.com/US/en/ar...dium-6f1d6fd371e068a07f357b9babe9ab2eec06d034

What do you make of this?

"The paper simply presents, mathematically, why a fifth dimension makes sense in a quantum theory.

The basic idea is that the universe has a fifth dimension, but we can’t ordinarily detect the dimension, not because everything is exactly the same, but because, when we make measurements of anything, we only perceive either an average or random value.

If this is true, it would mean that rather than being random, quantum mechanics is simply the result of classical motion in a largely invisible dimension.

Let’s look at an analogy: imagine a sealed box of gas. The box of gas is in equilibrium, so its state does not change with time. When we put a barometer or a thermometer into the box, it always reads the same value, e.g., 1 atmosphere and 20 degrees Celsius. Nevertheless, all the individual gas molecules in the box are in constant motion. So it is changing in time, but we cannot perceive that change because we are so large we can only measure the averages which never change.

It is the same in quantum mechanics. Our universe changes not only in time but in this fifth dimension."
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Secan said:
What do you make of this?
The most solid conclusion is that non-technical summaries in the popular press are of limited value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, Sunil and martinbn
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
The paper argues that loop Feynman diagrams in 1+3 dimensions can be obtained from tree diagrams in 1+4 dimensions by averaging over the extra dimension. If it's right that's interesting, but it would be incorrect to conclude that this implies that quantum physics in 1+3 dimension can be obtained from classical physics in 1+4 dimensions. Such a conclusion would be correct if it was true that the only difference between classical and quantum field theory is the fact that the latter contains loop Feynman diagrams. But that's not true, the appearance of loop diagrams is not the only difference. In particular there are no loop diagrams for free quantum fields, yet even for free fields there is a difference between classical and quantum field theory. The difference is in some principles (e.g. the Born rule, which is valid only for quantum fields) that are not encoded in Feynman diagrams. Even at a perturbative level, quantum theory is much more than computation of Feynman diagrams. Hence quantum physics as a whole cannot be obtained from classical physics with one dimension more.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 183 ·
7
Replies
183
Views
21K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K